PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHD vs. DVYA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHD vs. DVYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHD achieves a 4.38% return, which is significantly lower than DVYA's 13.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPHD having a 7.08% annualized return and DVYA not far ahead at 7.30%.


SPHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.63%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
7.08%

DVYA

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.51%
YTD
13.35%
6M
13.63%
1Y
39.49%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
7.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHD vs. DVYA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
13.35%30.22%6.05%13.75%-2.17%3.41%-9.61%14.70%-14.87%16.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHD and DVYA is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2012

0.55

The correlation between SPHD and DVYA shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPHD vs. DVYA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHD
DVYA

Real Estate

20.1%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

17.8%
5.2%

Financial Services

15.6%
30.9%

Energy

14.1%
5.0%

Utilities

13.7%
4.5%

Communication Services

8.6%
4.7%

Healthcare

5.1%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
10.9%

Technology

1.5%
1.6%

Industrials

0.0%
7.1%

Basic Materials

-

16.1%

Real Estate

SPHD
20.1%
DVYA
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPHD
17.8%
DVYA
5.2%

Financial Services

SPHD
15.6%
DVYA
30.9%

Energy

SPHD
14.1%
DVYA
5.0%

Utilities

SPHD
13.7%
DVYA
4.5%

Communication Services

SPHD
8.6%
DVYA
4.7%

Healthcare

SPHD
5.1%
DVYA
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHD
3.4%
DVYA
10.9%

Technology

SPHD
1.5%
DVYA
1.6%

Industrials

SPHD
0.0%
DVYA
7.1%

Basic Materials

SPHD

-

DVYA
16.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHD vs. DVYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

DVYA
DVYA Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DVYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVYA Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DVYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVYA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHD vs. DVYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHDDVYADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.53

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

4.59

-3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.78

16.66

-13.88

SPHD vs. DVYA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHD Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the DVYA Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHD and DVYA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHDDVYADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

3.05

-2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.66

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.42

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.30

+0.28

Drawdowns

SPHD vs. DVYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHD drawdown since its inception was -41.39%, smaller than the maximum DVYA drawdown of -45.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHD and DVYA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHDDVYADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.39%

-45.61%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-8.64%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-19.15%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-25.37%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.39%

-45.61%

+4.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.37%

-3.11%

-2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-10.06%

+5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.38%

+0.55%

Volatility

SPHD vs. DVYA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) is 2.99%, while iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that SPHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHDDVYADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.94%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

10.44%

-2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

13.00%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.16%

15.08%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

17.55%

+0.09%

SPHD vs. DVYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DVYA's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHD vs. DVYA - Dividend Comparison

SPHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than DVYA's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
4.33%4.71%5.97%6.48%7.29%5.81%3.66%5.52%6.24%4.74%4.79%5.33%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.62%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHD and DVYA have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVYA has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHD dropped -41.39% vs DVYA's -45.61%.

On 10-year performance, DVYA leads with 7.30% vs 7.08% for SPHD. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DVYA has performed better with a 7.30% return vs 7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DVYA.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 4.33% for DVYA.

SPHD is categorized as Dividend, while DVYA is Asia Pacific Equities. SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while DVYA tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SPHD and 0.49% for DVYA.

DVYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHD and DVYA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer