PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHB vs. CSSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHB vs. CSSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 30.36% return, which is significantly higher than CSSPX's 6.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHB has outperformed CSSPX with an annualized return of 18.92%, while CSSPX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.07% annualized return.


SPHB

1D
-0.67%
1M
12.37%
YTD
30.36%
6M
31.36%
1Y
69.40%
3Y*
29.63%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
18.92%

CSSPX

1D
0.24%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
6.71%
6M
6.31%
1Y
11.23%
3Y*
8.81%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
5.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHB vs. CSSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
30.36%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%33.96%-15.55%17.87%
CSSPX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc.
6.71%10.61%0.84%10.75%-25.08%26.46%-2.35%24.80%-3.86%12.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHB and CSSPX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.54

The correlation between SPHB and CSSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHB vs. CSSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CSSPX
CSSPX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CSSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CSSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHB vs. CSSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHBCSSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.17

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.52

1.08

+5.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.92

4.07

+21.85

SPHB vs. CSSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHB Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the CSSPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHB and CSSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHBCSSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

0.93

+2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.08

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.30

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.36

+0.17

Drawdowns

SPHB vs. CSSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, which is greater than CSSPX's maximum drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and CSSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHBCSSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-40.47%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-10.05%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.21%

-18.16%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

-32.72%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

-40.47%

-6.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-3.98%

+3.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-8.39%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.64%

+0.05%

Volatility

SPHB vs. CSSPX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) at 3.51%. This indicates that SPHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHBCSSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

3.51%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.99%

8.94%

+8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.16%

11.66%

+10.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.38%

15.94%

+11.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.45%

17.03%

+11.42%

SPHB vs. CSSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CSSPX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHB vs. CSSPX - Dividend Comparison

SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than CSSPX's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSSPX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc.
3.24%3.46%2.78%2.85%3.02%3.21%2.41%8.61%3.95%2.79%6.89%2.68%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.52%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHB and CSSPX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to CSSPX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs CSSPX's -40.47%.

SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHB and CSSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer