SPGP vs. RSPT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPGP (Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF) and RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPGP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 GARP Index, while RSPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPGP returned 14.80%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for RSPT. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPGP charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPT.

Performance

SPGP vs. RSPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGP achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than RSPT's 47.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGP has underperformed RSPT with an annualized return of 14.80%, while RSPT has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.

SPGP

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 3.93%
• YTD: 6.12%
• 6M: 6.65%
• 1Y: 17.19%
• 3Y*: 12.90%
• 5Y*: 7.90%
• 10Y*: 14.80%

RSPT

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 22.88%
• YTD: 47.30%
• 6M: 46.37%
• 1Y: 75.62%
• 3Y*: 33.71%
• 5Y*: 19.46%
• 10Y*: 22.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGP vs. RSPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPGP Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF	6.12%	9.80%	8.48%	20.29%	-13.83%	35.72%	15.92%	39.16%	1.68%	36.24%
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	47.30%	22.15%	15.16%	35.18%	-24.50%	28.53%	30.21%	42.07%	-0.61%	32.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGP and RSPT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2011	0.79

The correlation between SPGP and RSPT shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.84 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPGP vs. RSPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPGP	RSPT
Technology	22.8%	97.6%
Financial Services	22.2%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	18.0%	-
Industrials	16.8%	1.0%
Energy	7.1%	1.4%
Communication Services	6.6%	-
Healthcare	3.8%	-
Real Estate	2.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SPGP vs. RSPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGP

SPGP Risk / Return Rank: 32
SPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
SPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 37

RSPT

RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 91
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGP vs. RSPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPGP	RSPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	3.54	-2.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	4.27	-2.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.55	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	7.12	-5.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.94	25.76	-19.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPGP vs. RSPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the RSPT Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGP and RSPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPGP	RSPT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	3.54	-2.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.81	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.95	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.65	+0.09

Drawdowns

SPGP vs. RSPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGP drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, smaller than the maximum RSPT drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP and RSPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPGP	RSPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.08%	-58.91%	+16.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.15%	-10.67%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.87%	-26.62%	+3.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.87%	-32.49%	+9.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.08%	-33.67%	-8.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-0.76%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-8.90%	+4.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	2.95%	-0.05%

Volatility

SPGP vs. RSPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) is 3.74%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that SPGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPGP	RSPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	7.02%	-3.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.57%	17.12%	-5.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.13%	21.55%	-6.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.51%	24.08%	-5.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.20%	23.77%	-2.57%

SPGP vs. RSPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPT's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPGP vs. RSPT - Dividend Comparison

SPGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than RSPT's 0.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	0.25%	0.39%	0.44%	0.56%	0.71%	0.50%	1.29%	0.92%	0.98%	0.84%	1.16%	1.18%
SPGP Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF	0.88%	1.04%	1.38%	1.24%	1.22%	0.69%	1.10%	0.86%	0.95%	0.68%	0.89%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPGP and RSPT in my portfolio?

SPGP and RSPT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPGP or RSPT?

RSPT has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to SPGP (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGP dropped -42.08% vs RSPT's -58.91%.

Which ETF is better, SPGP or RSPT?

On 10-year performance, RSPT leads with 22.48% vs 14.80% for SPGP. On fees, SPGP is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, SPGP has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPGP or RSPT?

Over the 10-year period, RSPT has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 14.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPGP or RSPT?

SPGP is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPGP or RSPT?

SPGP has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.25% for RSPT.

What is the main difference between SPGP and RSPT?

SPGP is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPT is Technology Equities. SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index, while RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SPGP and 0.40% for RSPT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.