PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGP vs. HIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGP vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGP achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 96.27% return.


SPGP

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.93%
YTD
6.12%
6M
6.65%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
12.90%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
14.80%

HIBL

1D
-2.25%
1M
38.56%
YTD
96.27%
6M
98.56%
1Y
279.13%
3Y*
62.03%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGP vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
6.12%9.80%8.48%20.29%-13.83%35.72%15.92%4.16%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
96.27%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%21.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGP and HIBL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.85

The correlation between SPGP and HIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPGP vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPGP
HIBL

Technology

22.8%
45.8%

Financial Services

22.2%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

18.0%
12.9%

Industrials

16.8%
11.7%

Energy

7.1%
2.2%

Communication Services

6.6%
3.7%

Healthcare

3.8%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

4.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

3.2%

Technology

SPGP
22.8%
HIBL
45.8%

Financial Services

SPGP
22.2%
HIBL
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPGP
18.0%
HIBL
12.9%

Industrials

SPGP
16.8%
HIBL
11.7%

Energy

SPGP
7.1%
HIBL
2.2%

Communication Services

SPGP
6.6%
HIBL
3.7%

Healthcare

SPGP
3.8%
HIBL
2.9%

Real Estate

SPGP
2.7%
HIBL

-

Basic Materials

SPGP

-

HIBL
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPGP

-

HIBL
0.6%

Utilities

SPGP

-

HIBL
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGP vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGP
SPGP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGP vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPGPHIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.47

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

8.96

-7.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

32.84

-26.89

SPGP vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 4.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGP and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPGPHIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

4.26

-3.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.14

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.24

+0.49

Drawdowns

SPGP vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGP drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP and HIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGPHIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.08%

-88.27%

+46.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-31.39%

+20.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-69.66%

+46.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-81.58%

+58.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-2.25%

+1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-44.20%

+39.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

8.55%

-5.65%

Volatility

SPGP vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) is 3.74%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 21.25%. This indicates that SPGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGPHIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

21.25%

-17.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

50.46%

-38.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

66.16%

-51.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.51%

82.16%

-63.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

91.89%

-70.69%

SPGP vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPGP vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

SPGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than HIBL's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.18%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
0.88%1.04%1.38%1.24%1.22%0.69%1.10%0.86%0.95%0.68%0.89%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPGP and HIBL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIBL has higher volatility (21.25%) compared to SPGP (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGP dropped -42.08% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

On 5-year performance, HIBL leads with 11.57% vs 7.90% for SPGP. On fees, SPGP is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, SPGP has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 11.57% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPGP is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.88% for SPGP.

SPGP is categorized as S&P 500, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SPGP and 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGP and HIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer