SPGP vs. CDDYX
SPGP (Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF) and CDDYX (Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class) are both funds - SPGP is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P 500 GARP Index, while CDDYX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, SPGP returned 15.11%/yr vs 12.81%/yr for CDDYX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPGP charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CDDYX.
Performance
SPGP vs. CDDYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPGP achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than CDDYX's 9.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGP has outperformed CDDYX with an annualized return of 15.11%, while CDDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.81% annualized return.
SPGP
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 5.64%
- 1Y
- 16.13%
- 3Y*
- 11.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 15.11%
CDDYX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 9.15%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 20.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.81%
SPGP vs. CDDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGP Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF | 6.06% | 9.80% | 8.48% | 20.29% | -13.83% | 35.72% | 15.92% | 39.16% | 1.68% | 36.24% |
CDDYX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class | 9.15% | 15.95% | 15.17% | 10.65% | -4.84% | 26.43% | 7.92% | 28.74% | -4.27% | 20.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPGP and CDDYX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SPGP and CDDYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPGP vs. CDDYX — Risk / Return Rank
SPGP
CDDYX
SPGP vs. CDDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPGP | CDDYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.40 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 3.80 | -2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 14.30 | -8.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPGP vs. CDDYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPGP drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, which is greater than CDDYX's maximum drawdown of -32.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP and CDDYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPGP | CDDYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.08% | -32.74% | -9.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.15% | -5.51% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.87% | -12.99% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.87% | -16.91% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.08% | -32.74% | -9.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | 0.00% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -2.76% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 1.46% | +1.46% |
Volatility
SPGP vs. CDDYX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) at 2.70%. This indicates that SPGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPGP | CDDYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 2.70% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 6.96% | +5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.63% | 9.19% | +6.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 13.29% | +5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 15.69% | +5.54% |
SPGP vs. CDDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPGP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than CDDYX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPGP vs. CDDYX - Dividend Comparison
SPGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than CDDYX's 4.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDDYX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class | 4.93% | 5.33% | 5.99% | 4.96% | 3.90% | 2.93% | 1.85% | 3.28% | 7.65% | 4.03% | 3.84% | 8.35% |
SPGP Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.38% | 1.24% | 1.22% | 0.69% | 1.10% | 0.86% | 0.95% | 0.68% | 0.89% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPGP and CDDYX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPGP has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to CDDYX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGP dropped -42.08% vs CDDYX's -32.74%.
CDDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPGP and CDDYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer