SPGM vs. DRIV
SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both Global Equities funds - SPGM tracks the MSCI AC World IMI while DRIV tracks the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPGM returned 11.84%/yr vs 9.97%/yr for DRIV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPGM charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.
Performance
SPGM vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPGM achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 43.76% return.
SPGM
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 13.86%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 33.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.05%
DRIV
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 12.39%
- YTD
- 43.76%
- 6M
- 45.26%
- 1Y
- 96.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SPGM vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 13.86% | 23.62% | 16.75% | 21.34% | -17.53% | 21.13% | 15.28% | 26.58% | -11.19% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 43.76% | 30.42% | -5.04% | 26.14% | -34.13% | 27.80% | 62.76% | 28.54% | -21.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPGM and DRIV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SPGM and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPGM vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPGM
DRIV
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPGM
DRIV
Financial Services
SPGM
DRIV
-
Industrials
SPGM
DRIV
Consumer Cyclical
SPGM
DRIV
Communication Services
SPGM
DRIV
Healthcare
SPGM
DRIV
-
Consumer Defensive
SPGM
DRIV
-
Energy
SPGM
DRIV
-
Basic Materials
SPGM
DRIV
Utilities
SPGM
DRIV
-
Real Estate
SPGM
DRIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPGM vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank
SPGM
DRIV
SPGM vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPGM | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.60 | 3.88 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.55 | 4.51 | -0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.58 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 7.15 | -3.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.27 | 24.96 | -8.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPGM | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 3.88 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.37 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.55 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
SPGM vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPGM drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGM and DRIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPGM | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.97% | -41.93% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -13.43% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.90% | -34.18% | +17.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | -41.93% | +16.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -15.14% | +10.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 3.85% | -1.75% |
Volatility
SPGM vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is 3.82%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that SPGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPGM | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 9.35% | -5.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 19.30% | -8.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.85% | 25.12% | -12.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 27.06% | -11.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 27.41% | -9.83% |
SPGM vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPGM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPGM vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison
SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than DRIV's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.74% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 1.78% | 1.89% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.94% | 1.45% | 2.46% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPGM and DRIV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRIV has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to SPGM (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGM dropped -33.97% vs DRIV's -41.93%.
On 5-year performance, SPGM leads with 11.84% vs 9.97% for DRIV. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPGM has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 11.84% return vs 9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.
SPGM has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.74% for DRIV.
SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI, while DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPGM and 0.68% for DRIV.
DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPGM and DRIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer