PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGM vs. DRIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGM vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGM achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 43.76% return.


SPGM

1D
0.46%
1M
5.38%
YTD
13.86%
6M
15.08%
1Y
33.29%
3Y*
21.82%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
13.05%

DRIV

1D
2.31%
1M
12.39%
YTD
43.76%
6M
45.26%
1Y
96.84%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGM vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
13.86%23.62%16.75%21.34%-17.53%21.13%15.28%26.58%-11.19%
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
43.76%30.42%-5.04%26.14%-34.13%27.80%62.76%28.54%-21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGM and DRIV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018

0.87

The correlation between SPGM and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPGM vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPGM
DRIV

Technology

27.4%
34.0%

Financial Services

16.4%

-

Industrials

13.1%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
26.8%

Communication Services

8.5%
5.4%

Healthcare

8.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Energy

4.5%

-

Basic Materials

3.9%
14.4%

Utilities

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Technology

SPGM
27.4%
DRIV
34.0%

Financial Services

SPGM
16.4%
DRIV

-

Industrials

SPGM
13.1%
DRIV
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPGM
9.2%
DRIV
26.8%

Communication Services

SPGM
8.5%
DRIV
5.4%

Healthcare

SPGM
8.2%
DRIV

-

Consumer Defensive

SPGM
4.8%
DRIV

-

Energy

SPGM
4.5%
DRIV

-

Basic Materials

SPGM
3.9%
DRIV
14.4%

Utilities

SPGM
2.2%
DRIV

-

Real Estate

SPGM
1.9%
DRIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGM vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGM
SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIV
DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGM vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPGMDRIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

3.88

-1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.55

4.51

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.58

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

7.15

-3.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.27

24.96

-8.69

SPGM vs. DRIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGM Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is lower than the DRIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGM and DRIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPGMDRIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

3.88

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.37

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.55

+0.11

Drawdowns

SPGM vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGM drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGM and DRIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGMDRIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-41.93%

+7.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-13.43%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-34.18%

+17.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

-41.93%

+16.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-15.14%

+10.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

3.85%

-1.75%

Volatility

SPGM vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is 3.82%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that SPGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGMDRIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

9.35%

-5.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.31%

19.30%

-8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

25.12%

-12.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

27.06%

-11.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

27.41%

-9.83%

SPGM vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPGM vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison

SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than DRIV's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
0.74%1.07%2.07%1.62%1.24%0.32%0.29%1.23%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
1.78%1.89%1.98%2.09%2.37%1.94%1.45%2.46%1.89%2.29%1.87%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPGM and DRIV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIV has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to SPGM (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGM dropped -33.97% vs DRIV's -41.93%.

On 5-year performance, SPGM leads with 11.84% vs 9.97% for DRIV. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPGM has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 11.84% return vs 9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.

SPGM has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.74% for DRIV.

SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI, while DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPGM and 0.68% for DRIV.

DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGM and DRIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer