SPGM vs. CGGR
SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) and CGGR (Capital Group Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPGM is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC World IMI, while CGGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. SPGM is passively managed, while CGGR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPGM returned 20.31%/yr vs 23.98%/yr for CGGR. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPGM charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for CGGR.
Performance
SPGM vs. CGGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPGM achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than CGGR's 2.70% return.
SPGM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 27.63%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
CGGR
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- 17.24%
- 3Y*
- 23.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPGM vs. CGGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 10.39% | 23.62% | 16.75% | 21.34% | -9.58% |
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | 2.70% | 19.75% | 32.12% | 42.18% | -14.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPGM and CGGR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SPGM and CGGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPGM vs. CGGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPGM
CGGR
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SPGM
CGGR
Financial Services
SPGM
CGGR
Industrials
SPGM
CGGR
Consumer Cyclical
SPGM
CGGR
Communication Services
SPGM
CGGR
Healthcare
SPGM
CGGR
Consumer Defensive
SPGM
CGGR
Energy
SPGM
CGGR
Basic Materials
SPGM
CGGR
Utilities
SPGM
CGGR
Real Estate
SPGM
CGGR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPGM vs. CGGR — Risk / Return Rank
SPGM
CGGR
SPGM vs. CGGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPGM | CGGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.19 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 1.14 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.03 | 4.19 | +8.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPGM | CGGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 1.03 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.79 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
SPGM vs. CGGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPGM drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, which is greater than CGGR's maximum drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGM and CGGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPGM | CGGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.97% | -28.90% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -15.13% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.90% | -23.37% | +6.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | -4.40% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -7.70% | +2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 4.13% | -2.00% |
Volatility
SPGM vs. CGGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is 4.52%, while Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that SPGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPGM | CGGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 5.81% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 13.13% | -2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.26% | 16.75% | -3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 21.95% | -5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 21.95% | -4.36% |
SPGM vs. CGGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPGM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CGGR's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPGM vs. CGGR - Dividend Comparison
SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than CGGR's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 1.83% | 1.89% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.94% | 1.45% | 2.46% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SPGM and CGGR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CGGR has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to SPGM (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGM dropped -33.97% vs CGGR's -28.90%.
On 3-year performance, CGGR leads with 23.98% vs 20.31% for SPGM. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPGM has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGGR has performed better with a 23.98% return vs 20.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGGR.
SPGM has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.09% for CGGR.
SPGM is categorized as Global Equities, while CGGR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPGM and 0.39% for CGGR.
SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPGM and CGGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer