SPGM vs. ACWV

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Global Equities funds - SPGM tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI Index while ACWV tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPGM returned 12.68%/yr vs 6.98%/yr for ACWV. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPGM charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.

Performance

SPGM vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGM achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly higher than ACWV's 3.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGM has outperformed ACWV with an annualized return of 12.68%, while ACWV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.98% annualized return.

SPGM

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 9.50%
• YTD: 12.31%
• 1Y: 25.35%
• 3Y*: 19.37%
• 5Y*: 11.31%
• 10Y*: 12.68%

ACWV

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.53%
• 6M: 2.85%
• YTD: 3.42%
• 1Y: 5.53%
• 3Y*: 9.73%
• 5Y*: 5.39%
• 10Y*: 6.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGM vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	12.31%	23.62%	16.75%	21.34%	-17.53%	21.13%	15.28%	26.58%	-10.12%	23.26%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	3.42%	11.04%	11.38%	8.23%	-10.36%	13.97%	3.04%	21.04%	-1.42%	18.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGM and ACWV is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2012	0.67

The correlation between SPGM and ACWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.75 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPGM vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPGM	ACWV
Technology	30.7%	25.8%
Financial Services	15.7%	13.2%
Industrials	12.5%	8.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	5.1%
Communication Services	8.2%	11.9%
Healthcare	7.9%	13.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	9.8%
Energy	4.0%	3.7%
Basic Materials	3.8%	1.5%
Utilities	2.0%	7.3%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.6%

Return for Risk

SPGM vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGM

SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 72
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 78

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 23
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 21
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGM vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPGM	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	0.69	+1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	1.03	+1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.13	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	0.87	+1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.56	2.49	+9.06

SPGM vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGM Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGM and ACWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPGM vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGM drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGM and ACWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPGM	ACWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.97%	-28.82%	-5.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.50%	-6.37%	-3.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.90%	-7.56%	-9.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.93%	-18.14%	-7.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.97%	-28.82%	-5.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-1.91%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.78%	-3.11%	-1.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	2.22%	-0.02%

Volatility

SPGM vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 3.15%. This indicates that SPGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPGM	ACWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.01%	3.15%	+0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.58%	6.25%	+5.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.78%	8.06%	+5.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.17%	10.27%	+5.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.43%	12.29%	+5.14%

SPGM vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPGM vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than ACWV's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	1.94%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	1.80%	1.89%	1.98%	2.09%	2.37%	1.94%	1.45%	2.46%	1.89%	2.29%	1.87%	3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPGM and ACWV in my portfolio?

SPGM and ACWV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPGM or ACWV?

SPGM has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to ACWV (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGM dropped -33.97% vs ACWV's -28.82%.

Which ETF is better, SPGM or ACWV?

On 10-year performance, SPGM leads with 12.68% vs 6.98% for ACWV. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPGM or ACWV?

Over the 10-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPGM or ACWV?

SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ACWV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPGM or ACWV?

ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.80% for SPGM.

What is the main difference between SPGM and ACWV?

SPGM tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Index, while ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPGM and 0.20% for ACWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.