SPGI vs. XLF
SPGI (S&P Global Inc.) is a stock, while XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, SPGI returned 15.43%/yr vs 13.28%/yr for XLF. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SPGI vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPGI achieves a -21.00% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's -1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGI has outperformed XLF with an annualized return of 15.43%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively lower 13.28% annualized return.
SPGI
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -21.00%
- 6M
- -19.46%
- 1Y
- -17.82%
- 3Y*
- 2.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
XLF
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 6M
- -1.47%
- 1Y
- 8.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
SPGI vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGI S&P Global Inc. | -21.00% | 5.71% | 13.94% | 32.79% | -28.38% | 44.68% | 21.40% | 62.27% | 1.37% | 59.32% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -1.69% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPGI and XLF is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.55 |
The correlation between SPGI and XLF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPGI vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
SPGI
XLF
SPGI vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPGI | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.11 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 0.56 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 1.44 | -2.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPGI vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPGI drawdown since its inception was -74.67%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGI and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPGI | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.67% | -82.69% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.48% | -14.79% | -15.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.48% | -15.54% | -14.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.76% | -25.81% | -13.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.76% | -42.86% | +3.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.55% | -4.53% | -22.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.23% | -20.00% | +4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.37% | 5.78% | +10.59% |
Volatility
SPGI vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.20%. This indicates that SPGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPGI | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 4.20% | +3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.52% | 11.25% | +13.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.94% | 14.60% | +13.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.56% | 18.59% | +5.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.07% | 22.17% | +3.90% |
Dividends
SPGI vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
SPGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than XLF's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 0.94% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 0.65% | 0.82% | 0.84% | 1.18% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 1.34% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.48% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPGI and XLF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPGI has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to XLF (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGI dropped -74.67% vs XLF's -82.69%.
XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPGI and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer