SPFF vs. SPY
SPFF (Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPFF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the S&P Enhanced Yield North American Preferred Stock Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPFF returned 3.13%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for SPY. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPFF charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
SPFF vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPFF achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SPFF has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 3.13%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.
SPFF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 6M
- 8.28%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
SPFF vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPFF Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF | 6.91% | 7.52% | 8.62% | 3.00% | -14.29% | 5.15% | 6.91% | 13.04% | -2.55% | 1.80% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPFF and SPY is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2012 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, SPFF and SPY have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.
SPFF vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPFF
SPY
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
SPFF
SPY
Technology
SPFF
SPY
Utilities
SPFF
SPY
Healthcare
SPFF
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
SPFF
SPY
Basic Materials
SPFF
SPY
Real Estate
SPFF
SPY
Communication Services
SPFF
SPY
Industrials
SPFF
SPY
Consumer Defensive
SPFF
-
SPY
Energy
SPFF
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPFF vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
SPFF
SPY
SPFF vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPFF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.43 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 3.16 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 14.72 | -7.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPFF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 2.38 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.82 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.87 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.59 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
SPFF vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPFF drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFF and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPFF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.92% | -55.19% | +19.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -8.88% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.51% | -18.76% | +6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.88% | -24.50% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.92% | -33.72% | -2.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.70% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | -9.05% | +4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 1.91% | +0.58% |
Volatility
SPFF vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 2.97% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPFF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 2.84% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 8.90% | -1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.53% | 11.83% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 17.05% | -6.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 17.94% | -4.43% |
SPFF vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPFF has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPFF vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
SPFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPFF Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF | 6.34% | 6.47% | 6.39% | 6.64% | 7.15% | 5.78% | 5.75% | 5.97% | 7.60% | 7.24% | 7.04% | 7.50% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPFF and SPY have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPFF has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPFF dropped -35.92% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 3.13% for SPFF. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SPFF.
SPFF has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.
SPFF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while SPY is S&P 500. SPFF tracks S&P Enhanced Yield North American Preferred Stock Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SPFF and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPFF and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer