SPFF vs. EVPF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPFF (Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF) and EVPF (Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. SPFF is passively managed, while EVPF is actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPFF charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EVPF.

Performance

SPFF vs. EVPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) and Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF (EVPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SPFF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 3.90%
• YTD: 6.91%
• 6M: 8.28%
• 1Y: 18.49%
• 3Y*: 8.98%
• 5Y*: 2.16%
• 10Y*: 3.13%

EVPF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPFF vs. EVPF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SPFF Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF	8.12%
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF	1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SPFF and EVPF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026	0.58

Return for Risk

SPFF vs. EVPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPFF

SPFF Risk / Return Rank: 53
SPFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
SPFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SPFF Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SPFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SPFF Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPFF vs. EVPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) and Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF (EVPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPFF	EVPF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.46	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPFF	EVPF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	1.13	-0.83

Drawdowns

SPFF vs. EVPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPFF drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, which is greater than EVPF's maximum drawdown of -2.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFF and EVPF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPFF	EVPF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.92%	-2.36%	-33.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.17%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.06%	-0.52%	-3.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPFF	EVPF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.53%	4.31%	+5.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.93%	4.31%	+6.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.51%	4.31%	+9.20%

SPFF vs. EVPF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPFF has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than EVPF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPFF vs. EVPF - Dividend Comparison

SPFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than EVPF's 1.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF	1.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPFF Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF	6.34%	6.47%	6.39%	6.64%	7.15%	5.78%	5.75%	5.97%	7.60%	7.24%	7.04%	7.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPFF and EVPF in my portfolio?

SPFF and EVPF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPFF or EVPF?

On fees, EVPF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPFF or EVPF?

EVPF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SPFF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPFF or EVPF?

SPFF has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 1.08% for EVPF.

What is the main difference between SPFF and EVPF?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SPFF and 0.39% for EVPF.