SPFF vs. COPX
SPFF (Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPFF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the S&P Enhanced Yield North American Preferred Stock Index, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPFF returned 3.13%/yr vs 21.95%/yr for COPX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPFF charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
SPFF vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPFF achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 25.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SPFF has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 3.13%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.95% annualized return.
SPFF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 6M
- 8.28%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
COPX
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 17.74%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- 1Y
- 120.82%
- 3Y*
- 37.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.95%
SPFF vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPFF Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF | 6.91% | 7.52% | 8.62% | 3.00% | -14.29% | 5.15% | 6.91% | 13.04% | -2.55% | 1.80% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 25.71% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPFF and COPX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2012 | 0.36 |
SPFF vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPFF
COPX
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
SPFF
COPX
-
Technology
SPFF
COPX
-
Utilities
SPFF
COPX
-
Healthcare
SPFF
COPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPFF
COPX
-
Basic Materials
SPFF
COPX
Real Estate
SPFF
COPX
-
Communication Services
SPFF
COPX
-
Industrials
SPFF
COPX
Consumer Defensive
SPFF
-
COPX
-
Energy
SPFF
-
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPFF vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
SPFF
COPX
SPFF vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPFF | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.42 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 4.37 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 14.00 | -6.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPFF | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 2.93 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.55 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.62 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.19 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
SPFF vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPFF drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFF and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPFF | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.92% | -83.16% | +47.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -27.82% | +20.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.51% | -39.72% | +27.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.88% | -42.12% | +19.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.92% | -65.41% | +29.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -5.69% | +5.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | -39.30% | +35.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 8.66% | -6.17% |
Volatility
SPFF vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) is 2.97%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that SPFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPFF | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 15.38% | -12.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 35.68% | -28.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.53% | 41.41% | -31.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 36.51% | -25.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 35.55% | -22.04% |
SPFF vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPFF has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPFF vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
SPFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than COPX's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.13% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
SPFF Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF | 6.34% | 6.47% | 6.39% | 6.64% | 7.15% | 5.78% | 5.75% | 5.97% | 7.60% | 7.24% | 7.04% | 7.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPFF and COPX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to SPFF (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPFF dropped -35.92% vs COPX's -83.16%.
On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 21.95% vs 3.13% for SPFF. On fees, SPFF is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SPFF has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 21.95% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPFF is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
SPFF has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 2.13% for COPX.
SPFF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while COPX is Materials. SPFF tracks S&P Enhanced Yield North American Preferred Stock Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SPFF and 0.65% for COPX.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPFF and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer