SPFA.DE vs. FRCK.DE
SPFA.DE (SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF) and FRCK.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - SPFA.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond while FRCK.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPFA.DE returned 1.46%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FRCK.DE. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPFA.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FRCK.DE.
Performance
SPFA.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPFA.DE achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than FRCK.DE's 1.67% return.
SPFA.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 2.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.46%
- 10Y*
- —
FRCK.DE
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 10.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.49%
SPFA.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPFA.DE SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF | 0.46% | 2.44% | 3.19% | 5.66% | -4.47% | -1.04% | -5.66% | 14.72% | 0.62% |
FRCK.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 1.67% | 12.81% | 5.36% | 9.70% | -22.07% | -3.88% | 2.79% | 11.04% | -3.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPFA.DE and FRCK.DE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPFA.DE vs. FRCK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SPFA.DE
FRCK.DE
SPFA.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SPFA.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPFA.DE | FRCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.39 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 2.42 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | 10.09 | -7.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPFA.DE | FRCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 2.03 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.02 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.17 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
SPFA.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPFA.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.39%, smaller than the maximum FRCK.DE drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFA.DE and FRCK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPFA.DE | FRCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.39% | -32.71% | +16.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.96% | -4.49% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.66% | -7.78% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.51% | -32.71% | +24.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -0.97% | -2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.62% | -8.76% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 1.08% | +0.18% |
Volatility
SPFA.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SPFA.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) have volatilities of 1.83% and 1.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPFA.DE | FRCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.83% | 1.80% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.51% | 4.38% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.31% | 5.38% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.24% | 9.01% | -2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.05% | 9.29% | -2.24% |
SPFA.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPFA.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FRCK.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPFA.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPFA.DE nor FRCK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPFA.DE and FRCK.DE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FRCK.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FRCK.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPFA.DE.
SPFA.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond, while FRCK.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: State Street and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPFA.DE and 0.28% for FRCK.DE.
Find the right allocation for SPFA.DE and FRCK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer