SPFA.DE vs. IS3C.DE
SPFA.DE (SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF) and IS3C.DE (iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - SPFA.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond while IS3C.DE tracks the JP Morgan EMBI Global Core (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPFA.DE returned 1.46%/yr vs -3.40%/yr for IS3C.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPFA.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IS3C.DE.
Performance
SPFA.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPFA.DE achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than IS3C.DE's -1.63% return.
SPFA.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 2.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.46%
- 10Y*
- —
IS3C.DE
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 2.01%
- 5Y*
- -3.40%
- 10Y*
- -0.58%
SPFA.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPFA.DE SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF | 0.46% | 2.44% | 3.19% | 5.66% | -4.47% | -1.04% | -5.66% | 14.72% | 0.62% |
IS3C.DE iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) | -1.63% | 5.32% | -1.72% | 5.39% | -20.57% | -3.53% | 3.22% | 12.58% | -3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPFA.DE and IS3C.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPFA.DE vs. IS3C.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SPFA.DE
IS3C.DE
SPFA.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SPFA.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPFA.DE | IS3C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.08 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 0.48 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | 1.52 | +1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPFA.DE | IS3C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.44 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | -0.38 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.00 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
SPFA.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPFA.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.39%, smaller than the maximum IS3C.DE drawdown of -30.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFA.DE and IS3C.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPFA.DE | IS3C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.39% | -30.78% | +14.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.96% | -5.62% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.66% | -8.94% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.51% | -30.47% | +21.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -17.90% | +14.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.62% | -9.16% | +1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 1.79% | -0.53% |
Volatility
SPFA.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SPFA.DE) is 1.83%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE) has a volatility of 2.10%. This indicates that SPFA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPFA.DE | IS3C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.83% | 2.10% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.51% | 5.14% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.31% | 6.18% | -0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.24% | 8.94% | -2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.05% | 9.30% | -2.25% |
SPFA.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPFA.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3C.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPFA.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPFA.DE nor IS3C.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3C.DE iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 5.39% | 3.93% | 3.85% | 4.77% | 5.76% | 3.88% | 5.34% | 4.72% |
SPFA.DE SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPFA.DE and IS3C.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS3C.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS3C.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPFA.DE.
SPFA.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond, while IS3C.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPFA.DE and 0.50% for IS3C.DE.
Find the right allocation for SPFA.DE and IS3C.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer