SPFA.DE vs. FESD.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SPFA.DE (SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF) and FESD.DE (Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - SPFA.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond while FESD.DE tracks the Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPFA.DE returned 1.46%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for FESD.DE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPFA.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FESD.DE.

Performance

SPFA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SPFA.DE) and Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPFA.DE achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than FESD.DE's 3.41% return.

SPFA.DE

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 6M: 0.45%
• 1Y: 3.30%
• 3Y*: 2.58%
• 5Y*: 1.46%
• 10Y*: —

FESD.DE

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.35%
• YTD: 3.41%
• 6M: 3.08%
• 1Y: 9.14%
• 3Y*: 5.13%
• 5Y*: 1.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPFA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SPFA.DE SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF	0.46%	2.44%	3.19%	5.66%	-4.47%	2.13%
FESD.DE Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF	3.41%	0.21%	8.73%	4.67%	-13.30%	6.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SPFA.DE and FESD.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021	0.53

The correlation between SPFA.DE and FESD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPFA.DE vs. FESD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPFA.DE

SPFA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 20
SPFA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
SPFA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
SPFA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 19
SPFA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
SPFA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22

FESD.DE

FESD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 43
FESD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FESD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FESD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FESD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FESD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPFA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SPFA.DE) and Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPFA.DE	FESD.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	1.40	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	2.07	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.27	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.83	2.46	-1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.62	6.56	-3.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPFA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPFA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the FESD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPFA.DE and FESD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPFA.DE	FESD.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62	1.40	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.22	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.19	+0.07

Drawdowns

SPFA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPFA.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.39%, roughly equal to the maximum FESD.DE drawdown of -16.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFA.DE and FESD.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPFA.DE	FESD.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.39%	-16.01%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.96%	-3.71%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.66%	-12.34%	+4.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.51%	-16.01%	+7.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.19%	-0.59%	-2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.62%	-7.16%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	1.39%	-0.13%

Volatility

SPFA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SPFA.DE) is 1.83%, while Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that SPFA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FESD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPFA.DE	FESD.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.83%	2.28%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.51%	4.57%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.31%	6.51%	-1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.24%	8.80%	-2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.05%	8.70%	-1.65%

SPFA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPFA.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FESD.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPFA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Dividend Comparison

SPFA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FESD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FESD.DE Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF	6.69%	5.90%	5.86%	5.43%	4.80%	2.01%
SPFA.DE SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPFA.DE and FESD.DE in my portfolio?

SPFA.DE and FESD.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPFA.DE or FESD.DE?

On fees, FESD.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPFA.DE or FESD.DE?

FESD.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPFA.DE.

What is the main difference between SPFA.DE and FESD.DE?

SPFA.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond, while FESD.DE tracks Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPFA.DE and 0.45% for FESD.DE.