SPEM vs. SPY
SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPEM returned 9.45%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for SPY. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPEM charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
SPEM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPEM achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SPEM has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 9.45%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.
SPEM
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 12.45%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 31.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
SPEM vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 12.45% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -17.90% | 1.51% | 14.55% | 19.69% | -13.26% | 34.82% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPEM and SPY is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2007 | 0.73 |
The correlation between SPEM and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (5 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPEM vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPEM
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SPEM
SPY
Financial Services
SPEM
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
SPEM
SPY
Industrials
SPEM
SPY
Basic Materials
SPEM
SPY
Communication Services
SPEM
SPY
Energy
SPEM
SPY
Healthcare
SPEM
SPY
Consumer Defensive
SPEM
SPY
Utilities
SPEM
SPY
Real Estate
SPEM
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPEM vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
SPEM
SPY
SPEM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPEM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.43 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 3.16 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | 14.72 | -4.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPEM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.38 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.82 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.87 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.59 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
SPEM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPEM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -55.19% | -9.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.36% | -8.88% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -18.76% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | -24.50% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.06% | -33.72% | -2.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -0.70% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.75% | -9.05% | -5.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 1.91% | +1.19% |
Volatility
SPEM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that SPEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPEM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 2.84% | +2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.29% | 8.90% | +4.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 11.83% | +4.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 17.05% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 17.94% | +0.86% |
SPEM vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPEM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.47% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPEM and SPY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPEM has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 9.45% for SPEM. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 9.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for SPEM.
SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.
SPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SPEM and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPEM and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer