SPEM vs. SCHE
SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) and SCHE (Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - SPEM tracks the S&P Emerging Markets BMI while SCHE tracks the FTSE All-World Emerging. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPEM returned 9.45%/yr vs 8.87%/yr for SCHE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.11% expense ratio.
Performance
SPEM vs. SCHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPEM having a 12.45% return and SCHE slightly lower at 11.88%. Over the past 10 years, SPEM has outperformed SCHE with an annualized return of 9.45%, while SCHE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.87% annualized return.
SPEM
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 12.45%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 31.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
SCHE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 11.88%
- 6M
- 12.88%
- 1Y
- 30.59%
- 3Y*
- 18.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.87%
SPEM vs. SCHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 12.45% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -17.90% | 1.51% | 14.55% | 19.69% | -13.26% | 34.82% |
SCHE Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 11.88% | 26.54% | 10.60% | 8.93% | -17.84% | -0.65% | 14.49% | 20.31% | -13.57% | 32.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPEM and SCHE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2010 | 0.98 |
The correlation between SPEM and SCHE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPEM vs. SCHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPEM
SCHE
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SPEM
SCHE
Financial Services
SPEM
SCHE
Consumer Cyclical
SPEM
SCHE
Industrials
SPEM
SCHE
Basic Materials
SPEM
SCHE
Communication Services
SPEM
SCHE
Energy
SPEM
SCHE
Healthcare
SPEM
SCHE
Consumer Defensive
SPEM
SCHE
Utilities
SPEM
SCHE
Real Estate
SPEM
SCHE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPEM vs. SCHE — Risk / Return Rank
SPEM
SCHE
SPEM vs. SCHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPEM | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 2.72 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | 9.82 | +0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPEM | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.89 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.28 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.46 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.25 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
SPEM vs. SCHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than SCHE's maximum drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and SCHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPEM | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -36.20% | -28.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.36% | -11.29% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -17.08% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | -33.59% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.06% | -36.20% | +0.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -1.45% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.75% | -12.60% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 3.12% | -0.02% |
Volatility
SPEM vs. SCHE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) have volatilities of 5.69% and 5.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPEM | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 5.80% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.29% | 13.58% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 16.26% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 17.67% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 19.46% | -0.66% |
SPEM vs. SCHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPEM and SCHE have an expense ratio of 0.11%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPEM vs. SCHE - Dividend Comparison
SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than SCHE's 2.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHE Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.57% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 3.83% | 2.88% | 2.86% | 2.09% | 3.27% | 2.64% | 2.31% | 2.27% | 2.50% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.47% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SPEM and SCHE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHE has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to SPEM (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs SCHE's -36.20%.
On 10-year performance, SPEM leads with 9.45% vs 8.87% for SCHE. Both ETFs have the same 0.11% expense ratio. On volatility, SPEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPEM has performed better with a 9.45% return vs 8.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPEM and SCHE have the same expense ratio: 0.11% per year.
SCHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 2.47% for SPEM.
SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while SCHE tracks FTSE All-World Emerging. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab.
SPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPEM and SCHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer