PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEM vs. DEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEM vs. DEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEM achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly lower than DEM's 19.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SPEM has underperformed DEM with an annualized return of 9.45%, while DEM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.45% annualized return.


SPEM

1D
-1.40%
1M
3.20%
YTD
12.45%
6M
14.11%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
9.45%

DEM

1D
-1.19%
1M
6.63%
YTD
19.97%
6M
20.75%
1Y
32.23%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPEM vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
12.45%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
19.97%21.29%4.46%20.93%-10.43%11.49%-5.84%19.84%-7.69%26.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEM and DEM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007

0.90

The correlation between SPEM and DEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPEM vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPEM
DEM

Technology

28.2%
17.4%

Financial Services

20.2%
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
5.0%

Industrials

8.5%
9.5%

Basic Materials

8.2%
3.5%

Communication Services

7.2%
3.0%

Energy

4.7%
6.1%

Healthcare

4.0%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
5.8%

Utilities

2.8%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
3.0%

Technology

SPEM
28.2%
DEM
17.4%

Financial Services

SPEM
20.2%
DEM
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPEM
10.4%
DEM
5.0%

Industrials

SPEM
8.5%
DEM
9.5%

Basic Materials

SPEM
8.2%
DEM
3.5%

Communication Services

SPEM
7.2%
DEM
3.0%

Energy

SPEM
4.7%
DEM
6.1%

Healthcare

SPEM
4.0%
DEM
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPEM
3.9%
DEM
5.8%

Utilities

SPEM
2.8%
DEM
3.0%

Real Estate

SPEM
1.9%
DEM
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEM vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

DEM
DEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPEM vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPEMDEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.43

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

4.10

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

14.52

-4.39

SPEM vs. DEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the DEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEM and DEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPEMDEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.38

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.63

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.58

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.22

+0.01

Drawdowns

SPEM vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than DEM's maximum drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and DEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEMDEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.41%

-51.85%

-12.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-7.89%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-15.64%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

-27.18%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.06%

-37.79%

+1.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-1.19%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.75%

-12.90%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.22%

+0.88%

Volatility

SPEM vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) have volatilities of 5.69% and 5.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEMDEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

5.64%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

11.33%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

13.59%

+2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

15.33%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.80%

17.96%

+0.84%

SPEM vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPEM vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison

SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than DEM's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
3.76%4.88%5.24%5.49%8.62%5.87%4.21%4.78%4.47%3.67%3.63%5.21%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.47%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPEM and DEM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPEM has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to DEM (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs DEM's -51.85%.

On 10-year performance, DEM leads with 10.45% vs 9.45% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DEM has performed better with a 10.45% return vs 9.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DEM.

DEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 2.47% for SPEM.

SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SPEM and 0.63% for DEM.

DEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEM and DEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer