PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDV vs. VOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDV vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPDV having a 14.19% return and VOOG slightly lower at 13.78%.


SPDV

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.73%
YTD
14.19%
6M
14.91%
1Y
27.39%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*

VOOG

1D
-0.93%
1M
7.44%
YTD
13.78%
6M
13.58%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
28.13%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
18.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDV vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
14.19%10.90%14.40%5.45%-2.27%29.54%-6.09%20.46%-6.59%3.65%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.78%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDV and VOOG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between SPDV and VOOG has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPDV vs. VOOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDV
VOOG

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
9.4%

Energy

12.3%
0.1%

Technology

11.1%
49.4%

Healthcare

9.7%
5.8%

Financial Services

9.2%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%
1.0%

Real Estate

8.7%
0.6%

Industrials

7.8%
6.2%

Communication Services

7.8%
18.0%

Utilities

5.8%
0.4%

Basic Materials

5.1%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDV
13.5%
VOOG
9.4%

Energy

SPDV
12.3%
VOOG
0.1%

Technology

SPDV
11.1%
VOOG
49.4%

Healthcare

SPDV
9.7%
VOOG
5.8%

Financial Services

SPDV
9.2%
VOOG
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPDV
9.1%
VOOG
1.0%

Real Estate

SPDV
8.7%
VOOG
0.6%

Industrials

SPDV
7.8%
VOOG
6.2%

Communication Services

SPDV
7.8%
VOOG
18.0%

Utilities

SPDV
5.8%
VOOG
0.4%

Basic Materials

SPDV
5.1%
VOOG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDV vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDV
SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDV vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDVVOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

2.49

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

10.32

+3.35

SPDV vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDV and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDVVOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.16

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.76

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.91

-0.45

Drawdowns

SPDV vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and VOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDVVOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

-32.73%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-13.71%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.62%

-22.18%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-32.73%

+11.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-1.08%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-4.97%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

3.31%

-1.30%

Volatility

SPDV vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) is 2.76%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that SPDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDVVOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

4.32%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

12.41%

-4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.18%

15.85%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

21.19%

-4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

20.73%

-0.42%

SPDV vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPDV vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than VOOG's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
3.31%3.85%3.54%3.95%3.73%3.08%3.90%3.54%3.63%0.28%0.00%0.00%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.44%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDV and VOOG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOOG has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to SPDV (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

On 5-year performance, VOOG leads with 16.03% vs 8.17% for SPDV. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 16.03% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SPDV.

SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 0.44% for VOOG.

SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while VOOG is S&P 500. SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.07% for VOOG.

SPDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDV and VOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer