PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDV vs. EEMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDV vs. EEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPDV

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.78%
6M
13.02%
YTD
19.29%
1Y
30.26%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.72%

EEMD

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$807.83K$592.31K$401.15K

SPDV vs. EEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
19.29%10.90%14.40%5.45%-2.27%29.54%-6.09%20.46%-6.59%4.64%
EEMD
AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%9.61%17.60%-11.21%5.54%-0.35%12.55%-14.57%5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDV and EEMD is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2017

0.45

The correlation between SPDV and EEMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPDV vs. EEMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDV
EEMD

Consumer Cyclical

14.9%
8.8%

Technology

12.1%
6.6%

Real Estate

10.6%
9.8%

Healthcare

10.4%
9.5%

Financial Services

10.2%
9.0%

Energy

8.8%
10.6%

Industrials

8.4%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
9.7%

Communication Services

7.1%
9.1%

Utilities

5.7%
11.3%

Basic Materials

4.1%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDV
14.9%
EEMD
8.8%

Technology

SPDV
12.1%
EEMD
6.6%

Real Estate

SPDV
10.6%
EEMD
9.8%

Healthcare

SPDV
10.4%
EEMD
9.5%

Financial Services

SPDV
10.2%
EEMD
9.0%

Energy

SPDV
8.8%
EEMD
10.6%

Industrials

SPDV
8.4%
EEMD
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPDV
7.8%
EEMD
9.7%

Communication Services

SPDV
7.1%
EEMD
9.1%

Utilities

SPDV
5.7%
EEMD
11.3%

Basic Materials

SPDV
4.1%
EEMD
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDV vs. EEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPDV
SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPDV vs. EEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPDVEEMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.07

SPDV vs. EEMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPDV vs. EEMD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDVEEMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

Volatility

SPDV vs. EEMD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDVEEMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.20%

SPDV vs. EEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPDV vs. EEMD - Dividend Comparison

SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, while EEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMD
AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%4.03%8.41%7.66%6.34%3.84%5.35%4.91%0.42%
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
3.23%3.85%3.54%3.95%3.73%3.08%3.90%3.54%3.63%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDV and EEMD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPDV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPDV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EEMD.

SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.00% for EEMD.

SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while EEMD is Emerging Markets Equities. SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend & Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while EEMD tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.50% for EEMD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDV and EEMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer