SPDV vs. BENJ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SPDV (AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF) and BENJ (Horizon Landmark ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPDV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while BENJ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Horizon. SPDV is passively managed, while BENJ is actively managed. Over the past year, SPDV returned 24.69% vs 3.79% for BENJ. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPDV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BENJ.

Performance

SPDV vs. BENJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDV achieves a 13.31% return, which is significantly higher than BENJ's 1.64% return.

SPDV

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 13.31%
• 6M: 13.16%
• 1Y: 24.69%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: 9.01%
• 10Y*: —

BENJ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 3.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDV vs. BENJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF	13.31%	6.09%
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF	1.64%	3.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDV and BENJ is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025	0.01

Return for Risk

SPDV vs. BENJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDV

SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 69

BENJ

BENJ Risk / Return Rank: 98
BENJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BENJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BENJ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BENJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BENJ Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDV vs. BENJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPDV	BENJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	5.65	-3.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	9.14	-6.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	4.85	-3.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.28	9.74	-5.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.11	45.97	-33.86

SPDV vs. BENJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the BENJ Sharpe Ratio of 5.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDV and BENJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPDV vs. BENJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, which is greater than BENJ's maximum drawdown of -0.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and BENJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPDV	BENJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.81%	-0.39%	-43.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.80%	-0.39%	-5.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.37%	0.00%	-2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.53%	-0.02%	-6.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	0.08%	+1.96%

Volatility

SPDV vs. BENJ - Volatility Comparison

AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) at 0.11%. This indicates that SPDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BENJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPDV	BENJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	0.11%	+3.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.33%	0.25%	+8.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.31%	0.67%	+11.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.25%	0.60%	+15.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.28%	0.60%	+19.68%

SPDV vs. BENJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BENJ's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPDV vs. BENJ - Dividend Comparison

SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, while BENJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF	3.34%	3.85%	3.54%	3.95%	3.73%	3.08%	3.90%	3.54%	3.63%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPDV and BENJ in my portfolio?

SPDV and BENJ have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPDV or BENJ?

SPDV has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to BENJ (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs BENJ's -0.39%.

Which ETF is better, SPDV or BENJ?

On 1-year performance, SPDV leads with 24.69% vs 3.79% for BENJ. On fees, SPDV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, BENJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPDV or BENJ?

Over the 1-year period, SPDV has performed better with a 24.69% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPDV or BENJ?

SPDV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BENJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPDV or BENJ?

SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.00% for BENJ.

What is the main difference between SPDV and BENJ?

SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while BENJ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.40% for BENJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BENJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.65 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.