PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDG vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPDG vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPDG vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
2.94%11.66%20.22%8.14%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
-17.87%34.35%58.27%26.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDG achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -17.87% return.


SPDG

1D
-0.04%
1M
-5.10%
YTD
2.94%
6M
5.27%
1Y
13.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
3.72%
1M
-12.88%
YTD
-17.87%
6M
-17.28%
1Y
48.52%
3Y*
46.87%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*
35.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPDG vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDG has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPDG vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDG
SPDG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SPDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDG vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDGTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

0.72

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.29

1.41

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

1.41

-0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.40

4.28

+0.12

SPDG vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDG and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDGTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.72

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.65

+0.56

Correlation

The correlation between SPDG and TQQQ is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SPDG vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SPDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than TQQQ's 0.73% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
2.94%2.87%2.61%0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.73%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

SPDG vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDG drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDG and TQQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDGTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-81.66%

+65.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-36.97%

+25.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.83%

-28.08%

+21.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.22%

-18.66%

+16.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

12.13%

-9.05%

Volatility

SPDG vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) is 3.91%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 19.74%. This indicates that SPDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPDGTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

19.74%

-15.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

38.50%

-29.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.10%

67.35%

-51.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.20%

66.53%

-52.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.20%

65.83%

-51.63%