PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPCX vs. LSAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPCX vs. LSAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPAC and New Issue ETF (SPCX) and Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPCX vs. LSAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPCX
SPAC and New Issue ETF
0.73%7.81%2.84%-4.10%-12.25%9.28%3.00%
LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
1.40%-1.54%18.16%13.64%-12.99%25.10%2.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPCX achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than LSAT's 1.40% return.


SPCX

1D
0.45%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.73%
6M
2.32%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
3.29%
5Y*
-1.42%
10Y*

LSAT

1D
1.77%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
1.40%
6M
-2.97%
1Y
0.13%
3Y*
9.21%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPCX vs. LSAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LSAT's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPCX vs. LSAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPCX
SPCX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

LSAT
LSAT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LSAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
LSAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPCX vs. LSAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPAC and New Issue ETF (SPCX) and Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPCXLSATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

0.01

+0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

0.13

+0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.02

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

0.07

+0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.42

0.21

+1.21

SPCX vs. LSAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the LSAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPCX and LSAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPCXLSATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

0.01

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.34

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.65

-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between SPCX and LSAT is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SPCX vs. LSAT - Dividend Comparison

SPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.37%, more than LSAT's 1.87% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
SPCX
SPAC and New Issue ETF
16.37%16.48%0.69%2.27%0.00%1.28%0.00%
LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
1.87%1.90%1.31%1.85%0.36%3.44%0.30%

Drawdowns

SPCX vs. LSAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPCX drawdown since its inception was -28.28%, which is greater than LSAT's maximum drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPCX and LSAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPCXLSATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.28%

-20.48%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-13.54%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.59%

-20.48%

-0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.59%

-6.77%

-10.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.92%

-5.68%

-13.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

4.22%

+0.17%

Volatility

SPCX vs. LSAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPAC and New Issue ETF (SPCX) is 1.33%, while Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that SPCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPCXLSATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

4.05%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.38%

9.35%

-5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15%

17.26%

-7.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.16%

16.28%

-8.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.30%

16.90%

-7.60%