SPCT vs. MTUM
SPCT (Liberty One Spectrum ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPCT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Liberty One, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. SPCT is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPCT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
SPCT vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPCT achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 28.81% return.
SPCT
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 25.46%
- YTD
- 28.81%
- 1Y
- 37.17%
- 3Y*
- 32.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.53%
- 10Y*
- 16.62%
SPCT vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPCT Liberty One Spectrum ETF | 9.09% | 1.93% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 28.81% | -1.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPCT and MTUM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPCT vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
SPCT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MTUM
SPCT vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty One Spectrum ETF (SPCT) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPCT | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPCT vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPCT drawdown since its inception was -7.17%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPCT and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPCT | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -34.08% | +26.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -6.79% | +6.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -6.19% | +4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.30% | — |
Volatility
SPCT vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPCT | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.30% | 23.66% | -14.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.30% | 21.52% | -12.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.30% | 21.50% | -12.20% |
SPCT vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPCT vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
SPCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than MTUM's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.58% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
SPCT Liberty One Spectrum ETF | 0.74% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPCT and MTUM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SPCT.
SPCT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.58% for MTUM.
SPCT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Liberty One and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SPCT and 0.15% for MTUM.
Find the right allocation for SPCT and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer