PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPCK vs. TCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPCK vs. TCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPAC and New Issue ETF (SPCK) and Towle Value ETF (TCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPCK achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than TCV's 26.87% return.


SPCK

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.26%
6M
-0.03%
YTD
1.34%
1Y
3.66%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
-1.39%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.18%

TCV

1D
-0.89%
1M
3.05%
6M
14.79%
YTD
26.87%
1Y
42.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$38.34K$97.37K$145.22K
$839.64K$680.12K$340.23K

SPCK vs. TCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SPCK
SPAC and New Issue ETF
1.34%-1.32%
TCV
Towle Value ETF
26.87%2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SPCK and TCV is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPCK vs. TCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPCK
SPCK Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SPCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPCK Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SPCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPCK Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TCV
TCV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPCK vs. TCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPAC and New Issue ETF (SPCK) and Towle Value ETF (TCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPCKTCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.33

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.27

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.02

10.51

-8.50

SPCK vs. TCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPCK Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the TCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPCK and TCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPCK vs. TCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPCK drawdown since its inception was -28.28%, which is greater than TCV's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPCK and TCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPCKTCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.28%

-12.23%

-16.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.58%

-12.13%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.09%

-2.70%

-14.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.79%

-3.22%

-15.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

3.76%

-2.32%

Volatility

SPCK vs. TCV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPAC and New Issue ETF (SPCK) is 1.81%, while Towle Value ETF (TCV) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that SPCK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPCKTCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

4.79%

-2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.84%

13.59%

-8.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

20.43%

-14.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.33%

21.02%

-12.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.20%

21.02%

-11.82%

SPCK vs. TCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPCK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TCV's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPCK vs. TCV - Dividend Comparison

SPCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.27%, more than TCV's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
SPCK
SPAC and New Issue ETF
16.27%16.48%0.69%2.27%0.00%1.28%
TCV
Towle Value ETF
0.57%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPCK and TCV have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCV has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to SPCK (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPCK dropped -28.28% vs TCV's -12.23%.

On 1-year performance, TCV leads with 42.65% vs 3.66% for SPCK. On fees, TCV is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, SPCK has been the lower-risk option at 1.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TCV has performed better with a 42.65% return vs 3.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TCV is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SPCK.

SPCK has the higher dividend yield at 16.27%, compared with 0.57% for TCV.

SPCK is categorized as Actively Managed, while TCV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SPCK and 0.85% for TCV.

TCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPCK and TCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer