SPCK vs. SBTU
SPCK (SPAC and New Issue ETF) and SBTU (T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPCK is a Event Driven fund actively managed by Tuttle Capital Management, while SBTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle Capital Management. Both are actively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPCK charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for SBTU.
Performance
SPCK vs. SBTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPCK achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly higher than SBTU's -74.51% return.
SPCK
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 1.25%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
SBTU
- 1D
- 6.49%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- 6M
- -79.46%
- YTD
- -74.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPCK vs. SBTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPCK SPAC and New Issue ETF | 2.02% | -1.86% |
SBTU T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF | -74.51% | -67.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPCK and SBTU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPCK vs. SBTU — Risk / Return Rank
SPCK
SBTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPCK vs. SBTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPAC and New Issue ETF (SPCK) and T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPCK | SBTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.86 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPCK vs. SBTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPCK drawdown since its inception was -28.28%, smaller than the maximum SBTU drawdown of -94.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPCK and SBTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPCK | SBTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.28% | -94.22% | +65.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.54% | -91.68% | +75.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.81% | -71.44% | +52.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | — | — |
Volatility
SPCK vs. SBTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPCK | SBTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.57% | 159.15% | -152.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.31% | 159.15% | -150.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.23% | 159.15% | -149.92% |
SPCK vs. SBTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPCK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than SBTU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPCK vs. SBTU - Dividend Comparison
SPCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.16%, while SBTU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBTU T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPCK SPAC and New Issue ETF | 16.16% | 16.48% | 0.69% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPCK and SBTU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPCK is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPCK is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SBTU.
SPCK has the higher dividend yield at 16.16%, compared with 0.00% for SBTU.
SPCK is categorized as Event Driven, while SBTU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SPCK and 1.50% for SBTU.
Find the right allocation for SPCK and SBTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer