SPCK vs. SCSB
SPCK (SPAC and New Issue ETF) and SCSB (Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SPCK charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for SCSB.
Performance
SPCK vs. SCSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPCK
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 3.82%
- 5Y*
- -1.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.18%
SCSB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $166.70K | $122.05K | $88.76K | |
| $38.34K | $97.37K | $145.22K |
SPCK vs. SCSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SPCK SPAC and New Issue ETF | 1.09% |
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF | 1.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPCK and SCSB is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPCK vs. SCSB — Risk / Return Rank
SPCK
SCSB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPCK vs. SCSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPAC and New Issue ETF (SPCK) and Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPCK | SCSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.02 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPCK vs. SCSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPCK drawdown since its inception was -28.28%, which is greater than SCSB's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPCK and SCSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPCK | SCSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.28% | -0.52% | -27.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.09% | -0.20% | -16.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.79% | -0.10% | -18.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | — | — |
Volatility
SPCK vs. SCSB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPCK | SCSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.13% | 1.59% | +4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.33% | 1.59% | +6.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 1.59% | +7.61% |
SPCK vs. SCSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPCK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCSB's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPCK vs. SCSB - Dividend Comparison
SPCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.27%, more than SCSB's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPCK SPAC and New Issue ETF | 16.27% | 16.48% | 0.69% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPCK and SCSB have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCSB is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCSB is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SPCK.
SPCK has the higher dividend yield at 16.27%, compared with 1.62% for SCSB.
They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and Sterling Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SPCK and 0.33% for SCSB.
Find the right allocation for SPCK and SCSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer