SPC vs. FDIQ
Compare and contrast key facts about CrossingBridge Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPC) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ).
SPC and FDIQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPC is an actively managed fund by CrossingBridge. It was launched on Sep 20, 2021. FDIQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011.
Performance
SPC vs. FDIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPC vs. FDIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPC CrossingBridge Pre-Merger SPAC ETF | 1.37% | 5.02% | 4.57% | 6.05% | 2.03% | 2.40% |
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 11.40% | 6.32% | 12.76% | -0.84% | -7.23% | 12.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPC achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than FDIQ's 11.40% return.
SPC
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 4.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDIQ
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- 11.40%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 26.02%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPC vs. FDIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPC has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SPC vs. FDIQ — Risk / Return Rank
SPC
FDIQ
SPC vs. FDIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrossingBridge Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPC) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPC | FDIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 0.95 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 1.41 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.20 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 1.79 | -0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | 5.20 | -2.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPC | FDIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 0.95 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.38 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPC and FDIQ is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SPC vs. FDIQ - Dividend Comparison
SPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.86%, more than FDIQ's 2.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPC CrossingBridge Pre-Merger SPAC ETF | 13.86% | 14.05% | 7.10% | 3.62% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 2.52% | 2.66% | 2.69% | 2.89% | 2.51% | 2.04% | 2.92% | 2.44% | 2.45% | 1.59% | 1.50% | 1.92% |
Drawdowns
SPC vs. FDIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPC drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, smaller than the maximum FDIQ drawdown of -52.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPC and FDIQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPC | FDIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -52.86% | +47.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.42% | -14.15% | +8.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -7.12% | +4.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -11.64% | +11.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 4.86% | -2.98% |
Volatility
SPC vs. FDIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CrossingBridge Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPC) is 4.22%, while Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that SPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPC | FDIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 5.91% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 17.48% | -8.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.90% | 27.55% | -14.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.54% | 28.94% | -22.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.54% | 31.21% | -24.67% |