PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPAM vs. WISE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPAM vs. WISE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (WISE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPAM achieves a 24.10% return, which is significantly higher than WISE's -2.18% return.


SPAM

1D
0.76%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
24.10%
6M
20.96%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WISE

1D
-3.61%
1M
-5.13%
YTD
-2.18%
6M
-3.57%
1Y
17.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPAM vs. WISE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
24.10%4.86%10.58%6.74%
WISE
Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
-2.18%5.88%40.45%8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SPAM and WISE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023

0.70

The correlation between SPAM and WISE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPAM vs. WISE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPAM
WISE

Technology

89.6%
91.4%

Communication Services

5.7%
2.7%

Industrials

4.4%
1.4%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.7%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Technology

SPAM
89.6%
WISE
91.4%

Communication Services

SPAM
5.7%
WISE
2.7%

Industrials

SPAM
4.4%
WISE
1.4%

Real Estate

SPAM
0.4%
WISE

-

Financial Services

SPAM
0.1%
WISE

-

Basic Materials

SPAM

-

WISE

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPAM

-

WISE
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

SPAM

-

WISE

-

Energy

SPAM

-

WISE

-

Healthcare

SPAM

-

WISE
0.7%

Utilities

SPAM

-

WISE
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPAM vs. WISE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPAM
SPAM Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SPAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPAM Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SPAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPAM Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

WISE
WISE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
WISE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WISE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
WISE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
WISE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
WISE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPAM vs. WISE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (WISE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPAMWISEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.11

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

0.51

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

1.20

+0.47

SPAM vs. WISE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPAM Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the WISE Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPAM and WISE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPAM vs. WISE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPAM drawdown since its inception was -24.02%, smaller than the maximum WISE drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAM and WISE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPAMWISEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.02%

-39.15%

+15.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.02%

-34.08%

+10.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.85%

-16.72%

+5.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-11.90%

+5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.92%

14.44%

-3.52%

Volatility

SPAM vs. WISE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) is 12.02%, while Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (WISE) has a volatility of 13.48%. This indicates that SPAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WISE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPAMWISEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.02%

13.48%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.85%

25.50%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.40%

33.41%

-6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.74%

33.85%

-9.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.74%

33.85%

-9.11%

SPAM vs. WISE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPAM and WISE have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

SPAM vs. WISE - Dividend Comparison

SPAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than WISE's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
0.39%0.49%0.13%
WISE
Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
4.22%4.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPAM and WISE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WISE has higher volatility (13.48%) compared to SPAM (12.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPAM dropped -24.02% vs WISE's -39.15%.

On 1-year performance, SPAM leads with 18.17% vs 17.25% for WISE. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, SPAM has been the lower-risk option at 12.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPAM has performed better with a 18.17% return vs 17.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPAM and WISE have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

WISE has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 0.39% for SPAM.

SPAM tracks Solactive Cyber Security Index - Benchmark TR Net, while WISE tracks Solactive Generative Artificial Intelligence Index - Benchmark TR Gross.

SPAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPAM and WISE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer