SPAM vs. TSXU
SPAM (Themes Cybersecurity ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SPAM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Cyber Security Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPAM charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
SPAM vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPAM achieves a 33.77% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
SPAM
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- 24.26%
- YTD
- 33.77%
- 6M
- 25.92%
- 1Y
- 30.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPAM vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF | 33.77% | -12.62% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPAM and TSXU is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPAM vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
SPAM
TSXU
SPAM vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPAM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.90 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPAM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 4.53 | -3.64 |
Drawdowns
SPAM vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPAM drawdown since its inception was -24.02%, smaller than the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAM and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPAM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.02% | -35.62% | +11.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.90% | -0.92% | -2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.53% | -10.56% | +4.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.69% | — | — |
Volatility
SPAM vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPAM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.01% | 78.68% | -51.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 78.68% | -53.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 78.68% | -53.96% |
SPAM vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPAM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPAM vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
SPAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF | 0.37% | 0.49% | 0.13% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPAM and TSXU have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPAM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPAM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.37% for SPAM.
SPAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. SPAM tracks Solactive Cyber Security Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: Themes and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SPAM and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for SPAM and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer