PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPAM vs. CHPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPAM vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPAM vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
-5.88%4.86%10.58%5.42%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
12.20%58.47%7.75%10.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPAM achieves a -5.88% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 12.20% return.


SPAM

1D
3.78%
1M
0.69%
YTD
-5.88%
6M
-17.32%
1Y
1.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHPS

1D
5.84%
1M
-8.97%
YTD
12.20%
6M
33.13%
1Y
95.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPAM vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPAM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPAM vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPAM
SPAM Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SPAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPAM Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SPAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPAM Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPS
CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPAM vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPAMCHPSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.07

2.55

-2.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.29

3.10

-2.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.42

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

5.39

-5.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.02

18.93

-18.91

SPAM vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPAM Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPAM and CHPS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPAMCHPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

2.55

-2.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.98

-0.71

Correlation

The correlation between SPAM and CHPS is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SPAM vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

SPAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than CHPS's 0.60% yield.


TTM202520242023
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
0.52%0.49%0.13%0.00%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
0.60%0.68%1.75%0.36%

Drawdowns

SPAM vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPAM drawdown since its inception was -24.02%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAM and CHPS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPAMCHPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.02%

-39.44%

+15.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.02%

-17.50%

-6.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.11%

-12.68%

-7.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-9.63%

+3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.78%

4.98%

+4.80%

Volatility

SPAM vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) is 8.04%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 13.99%. This indicates that SPAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPAMCHPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

13.99%

-5.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.15%

26.20%

-7.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.80%

37.67%

-10.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.51%

32.80%

-9.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.51%

32.80%

-9.29%