PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOYB vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SOYB vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SOYB vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SOYB
Teucrium Soybean Fund
11.62%1.77%-20.48%-5.23%25.27%16.85%22.99%-2.16%-9.51%-6.38%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
5.77%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOYB achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SOYB has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 2.96%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 16.87% annualized return.


SOYB

1D
0.95%
1M
2.43%
YTD
11.62%
6M
13.70%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
-3.48%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
2.96%

SLV

1D
7.27%
1M
-19.83%
YTD
5.77%
6M
60.82%
1Y
119.88%
3Y*
45.50%
5Y*
24.10%
10Y*
16.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SOYB vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOYB has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SOYB vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOYB
SOYB Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SOYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOYB Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SOYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOYB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOYB vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOYBSLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

2.11

-1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.53

2.20

-0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.39

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

2.82

-1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.75

8.79

-5.04

SOYB vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOYB Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOYB and SLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOYBSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

2.11

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.69

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.54

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.25

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between SOYB and SLV is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SOYB vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

Neither SOYB nor SLV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SOYB vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOYB drawdown since its inception was -53.76%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOYB and SLV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SOYBSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.76%

-76.28%

+22.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-42.45%

+33.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.01%

-42.45%

+11.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.28%

-42.81%

+4.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.75%

-35.47%

+18.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.88%

-44.76%

+18.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

13.63%

-10.00%

Volatility

SOYB vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) is 5.48%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 18.91%. This indicates that SOYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SOYBSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

18.91%

-13.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

57.27%

-47.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.90%

57.07%

-43.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

35.28%

-17.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

31.36%

-14.27%