SOYB vs. IWM
SOYB (Teucrium Soybean Fund) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOYB is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOYB returned 1.20%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for IWM. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOYB charges 1.88%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
SOYB vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOYB achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 19.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SOYB has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 1.20%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return.
SOYB
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 7.15%
- 1Y
- 11.25%
- 3Y*
- -2.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 1.20%
IWM
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 19.22%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 39.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
SOYB vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 10.38% | 1.77% | -20.48% | -5.23% | 25.27% | 16.85% | 22.99% | -2.16% | -9.51% | -6.38% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 19.22% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOYB and IWM is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOYB vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
SOYB
IWM
SOYB vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOYB | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 3.57 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.08 | 12.63 | -9.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOYB vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOYB drawdown since its inception was -53.76%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOYB and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOYB | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.76% | -59.05% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -11.03% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.01% | -27.50% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.01% | -31.91% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.52% | -41.13% | +3.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.67% | 0.00% | -17.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | -10.76% | -14.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 3.12% | +0.54% |
Volatility
SOYB vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) is 3.94%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that SOYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOYB | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 7.16% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 14.29% | -5.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 19.73% | -6.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 22.61% | -4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 23.08% | -6.12% |
SOYB vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOYB has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOYB vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
SOYB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.87% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOYB and IWM have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWM has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to SOYB (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOYB dropped -53.76% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, IWM leads with 11.27% vs 1.20% for SOYB. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SOYB has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWM has performed better with a 11.27% return vs 1.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for SOYB.
IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for SOYB.
SOYB is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. SOYB tracks Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.88% for SOYB and 0.19% for IWM.
IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOYB and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer