PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOYB vs. IEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOYB vs. IEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOYB achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly higher than IEF's -0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SOYB has outperformed IEF with an annualized return of 1.20%, while IEF has yielded a comparatively lower 0.59% annualized return.


SOYB

1D
0.04%
1M
-4.85%
YTD
10.38%
6M
7.15%
1Y
11.25%
3Y*
-2.26%
5Y*
-0.20%
10Y*
1.20%

IEF

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.19%
YTD
-0.47%
6M
-0.18%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
2.86%
5Y*
-1.24%
10Y*
0.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOYB vs. IEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SOYB
Teucrium Soybean Fund
10.38%1.77%-20.48%-5.23%25.27%16.85%22.99%-2.16%-9.51%-6.38%
IEF
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.47%8.03%-0.63%3.64%-15.15%-3.33%10.01%8.03%0.99%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between SOYB and IEF is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOYB vs. IEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOYB
SOYB Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SOYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOYB Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SOYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOYB Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IEF
IEF Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEF Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEF Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOYB vs. IEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOYBIEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.12

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

0.84

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.08

2.35

+0.74

SOYB vs. IEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOYB Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the IEF Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOYB and IEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOYB vs. IEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOYB drawdown since its inception was -53.76%, which is greater than IEF's maximum drawdown of -23.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOYB and IEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOYBIEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.76%

-23.93%

-29.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-4.07%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.01%

-7.74%

-23.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.01%

-21.40%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.52%

-23.93%

-13.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.67%

-11.18%

-6.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.74%

-5.35%

-20.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

1.45%

+2.21%

Volatility

SOYB vs. IEF - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) at 1.62%. This indicates that SOYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOYBIEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

1.62%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

3.42%

+5.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

4.72%

+8.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.98%

7.71%

+10.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

6.63%

+10.33%

SOYB vs. IEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOYB has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than IEF's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOYB vs. IEF - Dividend Comparison

SOYB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEF
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.89%3.77%3.62%2.91%1.96%0.83%1.08%2.08%2.24%1.82%1.81%1.90%
SOYB
Teucrium Soybean Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOYB and IEF have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOYB has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to IEF (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOYB dropped -53.76% vs IEF's -23.93%.

On 10-year performance, SOYB leads with 1.20% vs 0.59% for IEF. On fees, IEF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IEF has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOYB has performed better with a 1.20% return vs 0.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for SOYB.

IEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 0.00% for SOYB.

SOYB is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while IEF is Government Bonds. SOYB tracks Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark, while IEF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.88% for SOYB and 0.15% for IEF.

SOYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOYB and IEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer