SOYB vs. FLUD
SOYB (Teucrium Soybean Fund) and FLUD (Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOYB is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark, while FLUD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. SOYB is passively managed, while FLUD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SOYB returned 0.26%/yr vs 3.63%/yr for FLUD. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. SOYB charges 1.88%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLUD.
Performance
SOYB vs. FLUD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOYB achieves a 12.90% return, which is significantly higher than FLUD's 1.53% return.
SOYB
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 12.90%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 14.47%
- 3Y*
- -0.07%
- 5Y*
- 0.26%
- 10Y*
- 1.86%
FLUD
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 5.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- —
SOYB vs. FLUD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 12.90% | 1.77% | -20.48% | -5.23% | 25.27% | 16.85% | 37.60% |
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.53% | 5.36% | 5.44% | 5.95% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOYB and FLUD is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2020 | -0.03 |
The correlation between SOYB and FLUD shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOYB vs. FLUD — Risk / Return Rank
SOYB
FLUD
SOYB vs. FLUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOYB | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.60 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 10.55 | -8.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 41.82 | -37.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOYB | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 2.76 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 2.73 | -2.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 2.59 | -2.59 |
Drawdowns
SOYB vs. FLUD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOYB drawdown since its inception was -53.76%, which is greater than FLUD's maximum drawdown of -1.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOYB and FLUD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOYB | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.76% | -1.66% | -52.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -0.44% | -8.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.01% | -0.59% | -30.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.01% | -1.66% | -29.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.80% | 0.00% | -15.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.76% | -0.24% | -25.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 0.11% | +3.46% |
Volatility
SOYB vs. FLUD - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) at 0.33%. This indicates that SOYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLUD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOYB | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 0.33% | +3.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | 0.74% | +8.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.06% | 1.68% | +11.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 1.34% | +16.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 1.26% | +15.72% |
SOYB vs. FLUD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOYB has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FLUD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOYB vs. FLUD - Dividend Comparison
SOYB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.27% | 4.51% | 4.97% | 4.72% | 1.39% | 0.92% | 0.93% |
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOYB and FLUD have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOYB has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to FLUD (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOYB dropped -53.76% vs FLUD's -1.66%.
On 5-year performance, FLUD leads with 3.63% vs 0.26% for SOYB. On fees, FLUD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLUD has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLUD has performed better with a 3.63% return vs 0.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLUD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for SOYB.
FLUD has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 0.00% for SOYB.
SOYB is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while FLUD is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.88% for SOYB and 0.15% for FLUD.
FLUD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOYB and FLUD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer