PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOYB vs. AMSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOYB vs. AMSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOYB achieves a 15.14% return, which is significantly lower than AMSC's 24.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SOYB has underperformed AMSC with an annualized return of 2.13%, while AMSC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.23% annualized return.


SOYB

1D
0.28%
1M
4.35%
6M
13.74%
YTD
15.14%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
-3.42%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
2.13%

AMSC

1D
-3.26%
1M
-8.99%
6M
17.25%
YTD
24.95%
1Y
-8.20%
3Y*
75.08%
5Y*
17.38%
10Y*
14.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOYB vs. AMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SOYB
Teucrium Soybean Fund
15.14%1.77%-20.48%-5.23%25.27%16.85%22.99%-2.16%-9.51%-6.38%
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
24.95%16.85%121.10%202.72%-66.18%-53.54%198.34%-29.60%207.16%-50.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SOYB and AMSC is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOYB vs. AMSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOYB
SOYB Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SOYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOYB Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SOYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOYB Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

AMSC
AMSC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
AMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOYB vs. AMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOYBAMSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.06

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

-0.16

+2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.02

-0.25

+5.27

SOYB vs. AMSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOYB Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the AMSC Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOYB and AMSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOYB vs. AMSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOYB drawdown since its inception was -53.76%, smaller than the maximum AMSC drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOYB and AMSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOYBAMSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.76%

-99.57%

+45.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-61.08%

+52.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.01%

-63.86%

+32.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.01%

-82.94%

+51.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.93%

-89.06%

+55.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.12%

-94.81%

+80.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.69%

-75.80%

+50.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

38.03%

-34.67%

Volatility

SOYB vs. AMSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) is 4.42%, while American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a volatility of 22.33%. This indicates that SOYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOYBAMSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

22.33%

-17.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

54.94%

-45.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.93%

85.50%

-72.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

87.45%

-70.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.80%

79.28%

-62.48%

Dividends

SOYB vs. AMSC - Dividend Comparison

Neither SOYB nor AMSC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SOYB and AMSC have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMSC has higher volatility (22.33%) compared to SOYB (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOYB dropped -53.76% vs AMSC's -99.57%.

SOYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOYB and AMSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer