SOYB.L vs. SSLN.L
SOYB.L (WisdomTree Soybeans) and SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - SOYB.L is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Soybeans, while SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOYB.L returned 0.60%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for SSLN.L. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOYB.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSLN.L.
Performance
SOYB.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SOYB.L is traded in USD, while SSLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOYB.L achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's 2.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SOYB.L has underperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 0.60%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.86% annualized return.
SOYB.L
- 1D
- -3.37%
- 1M
- -7.15%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- -1.94%
- 1Y
- 7.12%
- 3Y*
- -1.51%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- 0.60%
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 29.26%
- 1Y
- 113.88%
- 3Y*
- 45.97%
- 5Y*
- 21.70%
- 10Y*
- 15.86%
SOYB.L vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOYB.L WisdomTree Soybeans | 4.56% | 6.31% | -22.14% | 0.92% | 27.00% | 7.10% | 31.50% | -2.64% | -11.79% | -10.13% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 2.93% | 147.64% | 21.15% | -1.25% | 3.38% | -12.44% | 45.04% | 17.20% | -8.94% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOYB.L and SSLN.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011 | 0.15 |
The correlation between SOYB.L and SSLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOYB.L vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
SOYB.L
SSLN.L
SOYB.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Soybeans (SOYB.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOYB.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.36 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 2.77 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.48 | 6.05 | -4.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOYB.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 2.02 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.62 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.52 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.12 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
SOYB.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOYB.L drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -76.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOYB.L and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOYB.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -76.85% | +25.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -40.85% | +30.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.36% | -40.85% | +9.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.36% | -40.85% | +9.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.61% | -43.60% | -1.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.74% | -35.46% | +14.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.92% | -53.91% | +31.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 18.75% | -13.95% |
Volatility
SOYB.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Soybeans (SOYB.L) is 7.04%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 17.06%. This indicates that SOYB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOYB.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.04% | 17.06% | -10.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 53.33% | -41.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.29% | 55.93% | -39.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 35.31% | -15.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 31.01% | -12.29% |
SOYB.L vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOYB.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOYB.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SOYB.L nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SOYB.L and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SOYB.L.
SOYB.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while SSLN.L is Silver. SOYB.L tracks Bloomberg Soybeans, while SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SOYB.L and 0.20% for SSLN.L.
Find the right allocation for SOYB.L and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer