SOXX vs. XSMO
SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) and XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index, while XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOXX returned 35.55%/yr vs 15.17%/yr for XSMO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOXX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for XSMO.
Performance
SOXX vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXX achieves a 98.11% return, which is significantly higher than XSMO's 24.80% return. Over the past 10 years, SOXX has outperformed XSMO with an annualized return of 35.55%, while XSMO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.17% annualized return.
SOXX
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 12.49%
- YTD
- 98.11%
- 6M
- 99.51%
- 1Y
- 171.57%
- 3Y*
- 53.00%
- 5Y*
- 33.69%
- 10Y*
- 35.55%
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 24.80%
- 6M
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 37.87%
- 3Y*
- 24.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.65%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
SOXX vs. XSMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 98.11% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 24.80% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -3.44% | 23.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXX and XSMO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005 | 0.69 |
The correlation between SOXX and XSMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOXX vs. XSMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOXX
XSMO
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SOXX
XSMO
Basic Materials
SOXX
-
XSMO
Communication Services
SOXX
-
XSMO
Consumer Cyclical
SOXX
-
XSMO
Consumer Defensive
SOXX
-
XSMO
Energy
SOXX
-
XSMO
Financial Services
SOXX
-
XSMO
Healthcare
SOXX
-
XSMO
Industrials
SOXX
-
XSMO
Real Estate
SOXX
-
XSMO
Utilities
SOXX
-
XSMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXX vs. XSMO — Risk / Return Rank
SOXX
XSMO
SOXX vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOXX | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.31 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.50 | 3.98 | +6.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.20 | 13.44 | +24.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOXX vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXX drawdown since its inception was -70.21%, which is greater than XSMO's maximum drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXX and XSMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXX | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.21% | -58.06% | -12.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.77% | -8.89% | -6.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.36% | -24.76% | -16.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.75% | -29.62% | -16.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.75% | -39.39% | -6.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | 0.00% | -3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -11.12% | -8.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | 2.63% | +1.70% |
Volatility
SOXX vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a higher volatility of 19.42% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) at 7.71%. This indicates that SOXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXX | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.42% | 7.71% | +11.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.46% | 14.99% | +16.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.35% | 19.42% | +17.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.73% | 22.63% | +14.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.77% | 24.15% | +9.62% |
SOXX vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than XSMO's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXX vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison
SOXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than XSMO's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.52% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXX and XSMO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (19.42%) compared to XSMO (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXX dropped -70.21% vs XSMO's -58.06%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.55% vs 15.17% for XSMO. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, XSMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.55% return vs 15.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.
XSMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.28% for SOXX.
SOXX is categorized as Semiconductors, while XSMO is Momentum. SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index, while XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for SOXX and 0.36% for XSMO.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.43 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXX and XSMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer