PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOXX vs. LIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOXX vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOXX achieves a 98.11% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's 27.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SOXX has outperformed LIT with an annualized return of 35.55%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.53% annualized return.


SOXX

1D
1.59%
1M
12.86%
YTD
98.11%
6M
99.51%
1Y
164.50%
3Y*
53.00%
5Y*
33.69%
10Y*
35.55%

LIT

1D
2.02%
1M
-8.05%
YTD
27.00%
6M
29.31%
1Y
120.44%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
4.01%
10Y*
14.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOXX vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
98.11%40.74%12.92%67.12%-35.09%44.09%52.72%62.42%-6.49%39.79%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
27.00%60.05%-19.19%-12.18%-29.91%36.74%127.88%3.27%-28.63%64.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SOXX and LIT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2010

0.58

The correlation between SOXX and LIT shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SOXX vs. LIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SOXX
LIT

Technology

100.0%
11.5%

Basic Materials

-

55.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

26.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

SOXX
100.0%
LIT
11.5%

Basic Materials

SOXX

-

LIT
55.4%

Communication Services

SOXX

-

LIT

-

Consumer Cyclical

SOXX

-

LIT
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

SOXX

-

LIT

-

Energy

SOXX

-

LIT

-

Financial Services

SOXX

-

LIT

-

Healthcare

SOXX

-

LIT

-

Industrials

SOXX

-

LIT
26.0%

Real Estate

SOXX

-

LIT

-

Utilities

SOXX

-

LIT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOXX vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOXX
SOXX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

LIT
LIT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOXX vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOXXLITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.52

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.50

7.36

+3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.20

27.27

+10.94

SOXX vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOXX Sharpe Ratio is 4.43, which is comparable to the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOXX and LIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOXX vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOXX drawdown since its inception was -70.21%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXX and LIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOXXLITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.21%

-65.91%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.77%

-16.46%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.36%

-53.01%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.75%

-65.91%

+20.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.75%

-65.91%

+20.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-11.21%

+8.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.95%

-33.59%

+13.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

4.45%

-0.12%

Volatility

SOXX vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a higher volatility of 19.42% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 11.56%. This indicates that SOXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOXXLITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.42%

11.56%

+7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.46%

23.80%

+7.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.35%

33.94%

+3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.73%

32.04%

+4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.77%

30.77%

+3.00%

SOXX vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOXX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOXX vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

SOXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than LIT's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
0.38%0.49%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
0.28%0.57%0.67%0.78%1.26%0.64%0.81%1.23%1.37%0.90%1.08%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOXX and LIT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXX has higher volatility (19.42%) compared to LIT (11.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXX dropped -70.21% vs LIT's -65.91%.

On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.55% vs 14.53% for LIT. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, LIT has been the lower-risk option at 11.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.55% return vs 14.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LIT.

LIT has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.28% for SOXX.

SOXX is categorized as Semiconductors, while LIT is Commodity Producers Equities. SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index, while LIT tracks Solactive Global Lithium Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for SOXX and 0.75% for LIT.

SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.43 vs 3.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOXX and LIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer