SOXX vs. GDXJ
SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index, while GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOXX returned 35.55%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for GDXJ. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOXX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.
Performance
SOXX vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXX achieves a 98.11% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SOXX has outperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 35.55%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively lower 12.00% annualized return.
SOXX
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 12.49%
- YTD
- 98.11%
- 6M
- 99.51%
- 1Y
- 171.57%
- 3Y*
- 53.00%
- 5Y*
- 33.69%
- 10Y*
- 35.55%
GDXJ
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -17.04%
- YTD
- -8.37%
- 6M
- -6.68%
- 1Y
- 49.74%
- 3Y*
- 44.17%
- 5Y*
- 16.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
SOXX vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 98.11% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -8.37% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXX and GDXJ is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2009 | 0.21 |
The correlation between SOXX and GDXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (10 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SOXX vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOXX
GDXJ
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SOXX
GDXJ
-
Basic Materials
SOXX
-
GDXJ
Communication Services
SOXX
-
GDXJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SOXX
-
GDXJ
-
Consumer Defensive
SOXX
-
GDXJ
-
Energy
SOXX
-
GDXJ
-
Financial Services
SOXX
-
GDXJ
-
Healthcare
SOXX
-
GDXJ
-
Industrials
SOXX
-
GDXJ
-
Real Estate
SOXX
-
GDXJ
-
Utilities
SOXX
-
GDXJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXX vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
SOXX
GDXJ
SOXX vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOXX | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.20 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.50 | 1.30 | +9.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.20 | 3.55 | +34.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOXX vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXX drawdown since its inception was -70.21%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXX and GDXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXX | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.21% | -88.66% | +18.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.77% | -39.47% | +23.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.36% | -39.47% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.75% | -49.08% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.75% | -57.77% | +12.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -33.25% | +30.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -60.45% | +40.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | 14.41% | -10.08% |
Volatility
SOXX vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) have volatilities of 19.42% and 19.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXX | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.42% | 19.46% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.46% | 43.41% | -11.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.35% | 51.54% | -14.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.73% | 41.50% | -4.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.77% | 44.23% | -10.46% |
SOXX vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXX vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
SOXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than GDXJ's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.54% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXX and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (19.46%) compared to SOXX (19.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXX dropped -70.21% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.55% vs 12.00% for GDXJ. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.55% return vs 12.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GDXJ.
GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.28% for SOXX.
SOXX is categorized as Semiconductors, while GDXJ is Gold. SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for SOXX and 0.52% for GDXJ.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.43 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXX and GDXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer