SOXS vs. SMH
SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOXS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%), while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOXS returned -78.81%/yr vs 37.55%/yr for SMH. At a correlation of -0.98, they often move in opposite directions. SOXS charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
SOXS vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXS achieves a -91.68% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 75.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SOXS has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of -78.81%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.55% annualized return.
SOXS
- 1D
- -17.41%
- 1M
- -60.17%
- YTD
- -91.68%
- 6M
- -91.80%
- 1Y
- -97.83%
- 3Y*
- -86.41%
- 5Y*
- -79.75%
- 10Y*
- -78.81%
SMH
- 1D
- 4.01%
- 1M
- 24.01%
- YTD
- 75.55%
- 6M
- 76.44%
- 1Y
- 160.66%
- 3Y*
- 63.68%
- 5Y*
- 39.58%
- 10Y*
- 37.55%
SOXS vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -91.68% | -85.53% | -59.55% | -84.56% | 15.76% | -80.94% | -92.90% | -83.81% | -19.39% | -69.39% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 75.55% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXS and SMH is -0.97, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2010 | -0.98 |
The correlation between SOXS and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXS vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
SOXS
SMH
SOXS vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOXS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | 5.29 | -6.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.97 | 5.29 | -9.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.58 | 1.73 | -1.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 11.02 | -12.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 42.34 | -43.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOXS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | 5.29 | -6.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.74 | 1.14 | -1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.79 | 1.16 | -1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.79 | 0.34 | -1.13 |
Drawdowns
SOXS vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXS and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -84.96% | -15.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.64% | -14.93% | -82.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.79% | -35.74% | -64.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.97% | -45.30% | -54.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | -45.30% | -54.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | 0.00% | -100.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.60% | -41.09% | -51.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.48% | 3.89% | +66.59% |
Volatility
SOXS vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a higher volatility of 44.74% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 11.59%. This indicates that SOXS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.74% | 11.59% | +33.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 83.91% | 24.29% | +59.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.16% | 30.57% | +71.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.22% | 35.02% | +73.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.49% | 32.58% | +67.91% |
SOXS vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXS has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXS vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
SOXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.90%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 64.90% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXS and SMH have a correlation of -0.97, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXS has higher volatility (44.74%) compared to SMH (11.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXS dropped -100.00% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.55% vs -78.81% for SOXS. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMH has been the lower-risk option at 11.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.55% return vs -78.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 64.90%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
SOXS is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%), while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for SOXS and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.29 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXS and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer