SOVF vs. RUNN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SOVF (Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund) and RUNN (Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SOVF returned 7.32% vs 1.69% for RUNN. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SOVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RUNN.

Performance

SOVF vs. RUNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOVF achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly higher than RUNN's 1.94% return.

SOVF

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 1.14%
• 6M: 3.07%
• YTD: 5.41%
• 1Y: 7.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.24%

RUNN

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 2.15%
• 6M: -1.57%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 1Y: 1.69%
• 3Y*: 8.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	$6.62M	$3.92M	$2.57M
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund	$1.04M	$631.64K	$333.85K

SOVF vs. RUNN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund	5.41%	-4.38%	8.67%	14.18%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	1.94%	2.30%	17.16%	11.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SOVF and RUNN is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023	0.84

The correlation between SOVF and RUNN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

SOVF vs. RUNN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SOVF	RUNN
Technology	32.3%	19.6%
Financial Services	17.1%	12.8%
Industrials	15.1%	36.0%
Healthcare	11.5%	13.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	8.3%
Utilities	4.9%	-
Real Estate	4.1%	-
Energy	0.2%	-
Communication Services	0.2%	2.1%
Basic Materials	-	3.7%

Return for Risk

SOVF vs. RUNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SOVF

SOVF Risk / Return Rank: 17
SOVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SOVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SOVF Omega Ratio Rank: 16
SOVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
SOVF Martin Ratio Rank: 16

RUNN

RUNN Risk / Return Rank: 11
RUNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
RUNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
RUNN Omega Ratio Rank: 11
RUNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
RUNN Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SOVF vs. RUNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOVF	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	0.04	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	0.16	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.02	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.32	0.05	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.66	0.10	+0.55

SOVF vs. RUNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOVF Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the RUNN Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOVF and RUNN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOVF vs. RUNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOVF drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, which is greater than RUNN's maximum drawdown of -16.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOVF and RUNN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOVF	RUNN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.74%	-16.83%	-4.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.46%	-10.34%	-4.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.26%	-3.20%	-4.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.47%	-3.68%	-3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.06%	4.90%	+2.16%

Volatility

SOVF vs. RUNN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) is 4.59%, while Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that SOVF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RUNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOVF	RUNN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	5.07%	-0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.43%	10.41%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.83%	13.65%	+1.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.14%	13.90%	+3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	13.90%	+3.24%

SOVF vs. RUNN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RUNN's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOVF vs. RUNN - Dividend Comparison

SOVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than RUNN's 0.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	0.54%	0.55%	0.39%	0.33%
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund	0.73%	0.77%	0.30%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOVF and RUNN in my portfolio?

SOVF and RUNN have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOVF or RUNN?

RUNN has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to SOVF (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOVF dropped -21.74% vs RUNN's -16.83%.

Which ETF is better, SOVF or RUNN?

On 1-year performance, SOVF leads with 7.32% vs 1.69% for RUNN. On fees, RUNN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SOVF has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOVF or RUNN?

Over the 1-year period, SOVF has performed better with a 7.32% return vs 1.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOVF or RUNN?

RUNN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SOVF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOVF or RUNN?

SOVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.54% for RUNN.

What is the main difference between SOVF and RUNN?

They also come from different issuers: Sovereign's and Running Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOVF and 0.58% for RUNN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SOVF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.