SOVF vs. BIBL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SOVF (Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund) and BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOVF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Sovereign's, while BIBL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Inspire 100 Index. SOVF is actively managed, while BIBL is passively managed. Over the past year, SOVF returned 9.12% vs 32.81% for BIBL. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SOVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BIBL.

Performance

SOVF vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOVF achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 22.46% return.

SOVF

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: 2.84%
• 6M: 4.68%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 1Y: 9.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.85%

BIBL

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -1.49%
• 6M: 14.85%
• YTD: 22.46%
• 1Y: 32.81%
• 3Y*: 19.64%
• 5Y*: 9.17%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	$2.68M	$2.89M	$2.95M
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund	$1.06M	$637.93K	$334.04K

SOVF vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund	7.18%	-4.38%	8.67%	14.18%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	22.46%	17.27%	12.49%	13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SOVF and BIBL is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between SOVF and BIBL has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SOVF vs. BIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SOVF	BIBL
Technology	32.3%	33.0%
Financial Services	17.1%	8.3%
Industrials	15.1%	26.8%
Healthcare	11.5%	4.4%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	0.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	0.3%
Utilities	4.9%	3.4%
Real Estate	4.1%	14.2%
Energy	0.2%	5.4%
Communication Services	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	3.8%

Return for Risk

SOVF vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SOVF

SOVF Risk / Return Rank: 23
SOVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
SOVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
SOVF Omega Ratio Rank: 24
SOVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
SOVF Martin Ratio Rank: 20

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 82
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 76
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SOVF vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOVF	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.63	1.90	-1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	2.56	-1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.33	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.63	3.69	-3.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.30	13.27	-11.98

SOVF vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOVF Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOVF and BIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOVF vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOVF drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOVF and BIBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOVF	BIBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.74%	-36.12%	+14.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.46%	-8.94%	-5.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.70%	-5.10%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.47%	-6.96%	-0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.06%	2.48%	+4.58%

Volatility

SOVF vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) have volatilities of 4.80% and 4.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOVF	BIBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	4.89%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.56%	14.36%	-3.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.65%	17.42%	-2.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.16%	19.92%	-2.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.16%	21.10%	-3.94%

SOVF vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOVF vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

SOVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than BIBL's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	0.94%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund	0.72%	0.77%	0.30%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOVF and BIBL in my portfolio?

SOVF and BIBL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOVF or BIBL?

BIBL has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to SOVF (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOVF dropped -21.74% vs BIBL's -36.12%.

Which ETF is better, SOVF or BIBL?

On 1-year performance, BIBL leads with 32.81% vs 9.12% for SOVF. On fees, BIBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOVF or BIBL?

Over the 1-year period, BIBL has performed better with a 32.81% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOVF or BIBL?

BIBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SOVF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOVF or BIBL?

BIBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.72% for SOVF.

What is the main difference between SOVF and BIBL?

SOVF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while BIBL is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Sovereign's and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOVF and 0.35% for BIBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.