SOVF vs. MOO

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

SOVF (Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOVF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Sovereign's, while MOO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. SOVF is actively managed, while MOO is passively managed. Over the past year, SOVF returned -2.03% vs 6.05% for MOO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MOO.

Performance

SOVF vs. MOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOVF achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than MOO's 5.73% return.

SOVF

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: -2.69%
• 6M: -3.34%
• 1Y: -2.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MOO

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -5.05%
• YTD: 5.73%
• 6M: 6.15%
• 1Y: 6.05%
• 3Y*: 0.42%
• 5Y*: -0.49%
• 10Y*: 6.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOVF vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund	-2.69%	-4.38%	8.67%	14.18%
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	5.73%	15.61%	-12.43%	1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SOVF and MOO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023	0.57

The correlation between SOVF and MOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SOVF vs. MOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SOVF	MOO
Technology	32.9%	-
Financial Services	16.6%	-
Industrials	14.4%	21.7%
Healthcare	10.6%	14.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.0%	37.5%
Utilities	5.1%	-
Real Estate	3.7%	-
Communication Services	0.3%	-
Energy	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	25.7%

Return for Risk

SOVF vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOVF

SOVF Risk / Return Rank: 7
SOVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
SOVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
SOVF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
SOVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
SOVF Martin Ratio Rank: 7

MOO

MOO Risk / Return Rank: 15
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 14
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOVF vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOVF	MOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	0.43	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	0.71	-0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.08	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.14	0.57	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.29	1.56	-1.85

SOVF vs. MOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOVF Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the MOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOVF and MOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOVF vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOVF drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOVF and MOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOVF	MOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.74%	-69.53%	+47.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.46%	-10.68%	-3.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.39%	-20.77%	+6.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.39%	-16.97%	+9.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.00%	3.89%	+3.11%

Volatility

SOVF vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison

Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) at 3.36%. This indicates that SOVF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOVF	MOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	3.36%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.11%	10.82%	-0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.60%	14.09%	+0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.20%	17.14%	+0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	18.20%	-1.00%

SOVF vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOVF vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison

SOVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than MOO's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	2.34%	2.47%	3.41%	2.93%	2.15%	1.17%	1.10%	1.26%	1.69%	1.44%	2.14%	2.89%
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund	0.79%	0.77%	0.30%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOVF and MOO in my portfolio?

SOVF and MOO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOVF or MOO?

SOVF has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to MOO (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOVF dropped -21.74% vs MOO's -69.53%.

Which ETF is better, SOVF or MOO?

On 1-year performance, MOO leads with 6.05% vs -2.03% for SOVF. On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, MOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOVF or MOO?

Over the 1-year period, MOO has performed better with a 6.05% return vs -2.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOVF or MOO?

MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SOVF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOVF or MOO?

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.79% for SOVF.

What is the main difference between SOVF and MOO?

SOVF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MOO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Sovereign's and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOVF and 0.55% for MOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.