SOVF vs. IMCB
SOVF (Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund) and IMCB (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. SOVF is actively managed, while IMCB is passively managed. Over the past year, SOVF returned -2.03% vs 24.82% for IMCB. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SOVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IMCB.
Performance
SOVF vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOVF achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than IMCB's 15.70% return.
SOVF
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 6M
- -3.34%
- 1Y
- -2.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMCB
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 5.13%
- YTD
- 15.70%
- 6M
- 15.16%
- 1Y
- 24.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
SOVF vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund | -2.69% | -4.38% | 8.67% | 14.18% |
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 15.70% | 10.25% | 15.10% | 14.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOVF and IMCB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SOVF and IMCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SOVF vs. IMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOVF
IMCB
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SOVF
IMCB
Financial Services
SOVF
IMCB
Industrials
SOVF
IMCB
Healthcare
SOVF
IMCB
Consumer Cyclical
SOVF
IMCB
Consumer Defensive
SOVF
IMCB
Utilities
SOVF
IMCB
Real Estate
SOVF
IMCB
Communication Services
SOVF
IMCB
Energy
SOVF
IMCB
Basic Materials
SOVF
-
IMCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOVF vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank
SOVF
IMCB
SOVF vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOVF | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.33 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 3.10 | -3.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 12.13 | -12.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOVF vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOVF drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOVF and IMCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOVF | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.74% | -58.80% | +37.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.46% | -8.05% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.39% | -0.74% | -13.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -7.72% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.00% | 2.05% | +4.95% |
Volatility
SOVF vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) is 3.78%, while iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that SOVF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOVF | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 4.79% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 10.26% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.60% | 13.29% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 17.65% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 19.68% | -2.48% |
SOVF vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOVF vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison
SOVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than IMCB's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.23% | 1.42% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.47% |
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund | 0.79% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOVF and IMCB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMCB has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to SOVF (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOVF dropped -21.74% vs IMCB's -58.80%.
On 1-year performance, IMCB leads with 24.82% vs -2.03% for SOVF. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SOVF has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 24.82% return vs -2.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SOVF.
IMCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.79% for SOVF.
They also come from different issuers: Sovereign's and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOVF and 0.04% for IMCB.
IMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOVF and IMCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer