PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOVF vs. DRES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOVF vs. DRES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOVF achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly lower than DRES's 21.60% return.


SOVF

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.14%
6M
3.07%
YTD
5.41%
1Y
7.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.24%

DRES

1D
0.30%
1M
0.31%
6M
12.48%
YTD
21.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$93.72K$76.15K$99.36K
$1.04M$631.64K$333.85K

SOVF vs. DRES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SOVF
Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund
5.41%-2.90%
DRES
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF
21.60%2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SOVF and DRES is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.52

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOVF vs. DRES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SOVF
SOVF Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SOVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOVF Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SOVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOVF Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

DRES

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SOVF vs. DRES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOVFDRESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.66

SOVF vs. DRES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOVF vs. DRES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOVF drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, which is greater than DRES's maximum drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOVF and DRES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOVFDRESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.74%

-10.41%

-11.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.26%

-1.59%

-5.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-2.14%

-5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.06%

Volatility

SOVF vs. DRES - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOVFDRESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

18.07%

-3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

18.07%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

18.07%

-0.93%

SOVF vs. DRES - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRES's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOVF vs. DRES - Dividend Comparison

SOVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than DRES's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DRES
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF
0.52%0.22%0.00%0.00%
SOVF
Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund
0.73%0.77%0.30%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOVF and DRES have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRES is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRES is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SOVF.

SOVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.52% for DRES.

They also come from different issuers: Sovereign's and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOVF and 0.50% for DRES.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOVF and DRES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer