SOVF vs. BNO
SOVF (Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - SOVF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Sovereign's, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. SOVF is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, SOVF returned -4.19% vs 91.89% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SOVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.
Performance
SOVF vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOVF achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.
SOVF
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- -2.81%
- 6M
- -0.11%
- 1Y
- -4.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- 90.47%
- 6M
- 86.00%
- 1Y
- 91.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 24.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
SOVF vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund | -2.81% | -4.38% | 8.67% | 16.18% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 90.47% | -5.44% | 9.67% | -13.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOVF and BNO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2023 | -0.01 |
The correlation between SOVF and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOVF vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
SOVF
BNO
SOVF vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOVF | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | 2.23 | -2.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | 2.73 | -3.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.38 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 5.17 | -5.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 9.76 | -10.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOVF | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 | 2.23 | -2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.14 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
SOVF vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOVF drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOVF and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOVF | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.74% | -87.06% | +65.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.46% | -17.87% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.49% | -10.29% | -4.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.28% | -40.17% | +32.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.79% | 9.45% | -2.66% |
Volatility
SOVF vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) is 3.81%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that SOVF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOVF | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 14.22% | -10.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 36.10% | -25.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.76% | 41.46% | -26.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 35.38% | -18.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 36.68% | -19.43% |
SOVF vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOVF vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
SOVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund | 0.80% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOVF and BNO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to SOVF (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOVF dropped -21.74% vs BNO's -87.06%.
On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 91.89% vs -4.19% for SOVF. On fees, SOVF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SOVF has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 91.89% return vs -4.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOVF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.
SOVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
SOVF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Sovereign's and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOVF and 0.90% for BNO.
BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOVF and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer