PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOVF vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOVF vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOVF achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.


SOVF

1D
-1.72%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
-2.81%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
-4.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOVF vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SOVF
Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund
-2.81%-4.38%8.67%16.18%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
90.47%-5.44%9.67%-13.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SOVF and BNO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2023

-0.01

The correlation between SOVF and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOVF vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOVF
SOVF Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SOVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOVF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SOVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOVF Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOVF vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOVFBNODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.29

2.23

-2.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.30

2.73

-3.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.38

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

5.17

-5.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.62

9.76

-10.38

SOVF vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOVF Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOVF and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOVFBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

2.23

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.14

+0.22

Drawdowns

SOVF vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOVF drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOVF and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOVFBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.74%

-87.06%

+65.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.46%

-17.87%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.49%

-10.29%

-4.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.28%

-40.17%

+32.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.79%

9.45%

-2.66%

Volatility

SOVF vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) is 3.81%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that SOVF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOVFBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

14.22%

-10.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

36.10%

-25.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

41.46%

-26.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

35.38%

-18.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

36.68%

-19.43%

SOVF vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOVF vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

SOVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOVF
Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund
0.80%0.77%0.30%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOVF and BNO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to SOVF (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOVF dropped -21.74% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 91.89% vs -4.19% for SOVF. On fees, SOVF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SOVF has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 91.89% return vs -4.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOVF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

SOVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

SOVF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Sovereign's and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOVF and 0.90% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOVF and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer