PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SONO vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SONO vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sonos, Inc. (SONO) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SONO achieves a -19.87% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 13.29% return.


SONO

1D
-0.64%
1M
-9.28%
YTD
-19.87%
6M
-21.62%
1Y
36.07%
3Y*
-2.54%
5Y*
-16.60%
10Y*

VEA

1D
0.16%
1M
0.27%
YTD
13.29%
6M
12.91%
1Y
28.78%
3Y*
19.54%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SONO vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
-19.87%16.76%-12.25%1.42%-43.29%27.40%49.74%59.06%-38.62%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
13.29%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-13.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SONO and VEA is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SONO vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SONO
SONO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SONO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SONO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SONO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SONO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SONO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SONO vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sonos, Inc. (SONO) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SONOVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.32

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

2.49

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

9.55

-7.31

SONO vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SONO Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SONO and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SONO vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SONO drawdown since its inception was -82.46%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SONO and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SONOVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.46%

-60.68%

-21.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.72%

-11.63%

-22.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.53%

-13.45%

-47.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.36%

-29.71%

-51.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.94%

-2.91%

-65.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.64%

-13.26%

-36.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.15%

3.02%

+13.13%

Volatility

SONO vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

Sonos, Inc. (SONO) has a higher volatility of 14.98% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 7.08%. This indicates that SONO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SONOVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.98%

7.08%

+7.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.81%

14.73%

+15.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.77%

16.78%

+24.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.29%

16.76%

+30.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.71%

17.20%

+37.51%

Dividends

SONO vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

SONO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.58%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


SONO and VEA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SONO has higher volatility (14.98%) compared to VEA (7.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SONO dropped -82.46% vs VEA's -60.68%.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SONO and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer