PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SON vs. NWFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SON vs. NWFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sonoco Products Company (SON) and Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SON achieves a 17.94% return, which is significantly higher than NWFL's 12.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SON has underperformed NWFL with an annualized return of 4.22%, while NWFL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.26% annualized return.


SON

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.21%
YTD
17.94%
6M
19.23%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
-0.11%
5Y*
-1.46%
10Y*
4.22%

NWFL

1D
0.15%
1M
2.79%
YTD
12.27%
6M
8.89%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SON vs. NWFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SON
Sonoco Products Company
17.94%-6.30%-9.12%-4.69%8.30%0.53%-0.73%19.53%3.06%3.92%
NWFL
Norwood Financial Corp.
12.27%8.41%-13.60%2.42%34.10%3.36%-30.30%21.46%2.67%54.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SON and NWFL is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 1998

0.12

The correlation between SON and NWFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

SON:

$10.39

NWFL:

$3.74

PE Ratio

SON:

4.86

NWFL:

8.24

PEG Ratio

SON:

0.09

NWFL:

0.49

PS Ratio

SON:

0.67

NWFL:

1.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

SON:

$7.49B

NWFL:

$142.09M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SON:

$1.57B

NWFL:

$67.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

SON:

$1.40B

NWFL:

$28.94M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Sonoco Products Company

Norwood Financial Corp.

Return for Risk

SON vs. NWFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SON
SON Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SON Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SON Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SON Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SON Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NWFL
NWFL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
NWFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWFL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NWFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWFL Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SON vs. NWFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sonoco Products Company (SON) and Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SONNWFLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.20

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

2.11

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

5.04

-2.63

SON vs. NWFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SON Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the NWFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SON and NWFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SON vs. NWFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SON drawdown since its inception was -65.36%, which is greater than NWFL's maximum drawdown of -49.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SON and NWFL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SONNWFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.36%

-49.67%

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.40%

-12.87%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.46%

-33.55%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.94%

-33.55%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.57%

-43.94%

+2.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.90%

-4.12%

-7.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.77%

-14.29%

-4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.39%

5.38%

+4.01%

Volatility

SON vs. NWFL - Volatility Comparison

Sonoco Products Company (SON) and Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) have volatilities of 7.83% and 7.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SONNWFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.83%

7.88%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.21%

20.58%

+6.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.39%

26.67%

+4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.73%

32.65%

-6.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.75%

37.11%

-11.36%

Dividends

SON vs. NWFL - Dividend Comparison

SON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than NWFL's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NWFL
Norwood Financial Corp.
4.09%4.42%4.41%3.52%3.35%4.00%3.82%2.47%2.67%2.61%3.74%4.28%
SON
Sonoco Products Company
4.22%4.84%4.24%3.62%3.16%3.11%2.90%2.75%3.05%2.90%2.77%3.35%

Financials

SON vs. NWFL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sonoco Products Company and Norwood Financial Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.68B
38.38M
(SON) Total Revenue
(NWFL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SON vs. NWFL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sonoco Products Company and Norwood Financial Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
20.6%
0
Portfolio components
SON - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported a gross profit of 345.63M and revenue of 1.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.6%.

NWFL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norwood Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 38.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SON - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported an operating income of 127.09M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

NWFL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norwood Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 38.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

SON - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported a net income of 67.60M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.

NWFL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norwood Financial Corp. reported a net income of 3.73M and revenue of 38.38M, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SON and NWFL have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NWFL has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to SON (7.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SON dropped -65.36% vs NWFL's -49.67%.

NWFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SON and NWFL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer