SOLZ vs. OOQB
Compare and contrast key facts about Solana ETF (SOLZ) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB).
SOLZ and OOQB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SOLZ is an actively managed fund by Volatility Shares. It was launched on Mar 19, 2025. OOQB is an actively managed fund by Volatility Shares. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025.
Performance
SOLZ vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SOLZ vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLZ Solana ETF | -34.00% | -12.47% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | -28.69% | 14.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLZ achieves a -34.00% return, which is significantly lower than OOQB's -28.69% return.
SOLZ
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- -34.00%
- 6M
- -61.78%
- 1Y
- -40.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OOQB
- 1D
- 5.72%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -28.69%
- 6M
- -45.98%
- 1Y
- -14.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SOLZ vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SOLZ vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank
SOLZ
OOQB
SOLZ vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solana ETF (SOLZ) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOLZ | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | -0.25 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | 0.04 | -0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.01 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | -0.30 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | -0.66 | -0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOLZ | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | -0.25 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.52 | -0.57 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLZ and OOQB is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SOLZ vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison
SOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than OOQB's 13.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLZ Solana ETF | 3.41% | 1.75% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | 13.89% | 9.53% |
Drawdowns
SOLZ vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLZ drawdown since its inception was -70.23%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLZ and OOQB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLZ | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.23% | -53.44% | -16.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.23% | -53.44% | -16.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.11% | -50.78% | -17.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.47% | -19.94% | -8.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.00% | 23.98% | +13.02% |
Volatility
SOLZ vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison
Solana ETF (SOLZ) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) have volatilities of 18.65% and 18.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SOLZ | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.65% | 18.69% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.48% | 46.05% | +12.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.49% | 59.59% | +19.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.89% | 61.96% | +17.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.89% | 61.96% | +17.93% |